Advertisement
Advertisement
Skip to content
Follow Us on
Advertisement
TOP STORIES
Excise Duty

Excise Rule 26 Penalty Set Aside as Goods Were Not Liable for Confiscation

Case Law Details

Case Name
Sanjeev Khera Vs Additional Director General (Adjudication) (CESTAT Delhi)
Date of Judgement/Order
Only available for paid members
Advertisement Sanjeev Khera Vs Additional Director General (Adjudication) (CESTAT Delhi) The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Delhi, considered whether penalties imposed under Rule 26 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002 could be sustained against five appellants. The appellants argued that the impugned order did not confiscate the goods and also did not contain any finding that the goods were liable to confiscation. They submitted that the order merely stated, while imposing penalties, that the goods were liable to confiscation. The department supported the penalti...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Advertisement

Author Info

CA Sandeep Kanoi
Qualification: CA in Job / Business
Company: Taxguru Consultancy
Location: Mumbai, Maharashtra
Articles Published: 18,778

Join TaxGuru's Network for the latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *