This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Excise Rule 26 Penalty Set Aside as Goods Were Not Liable for Confiscation
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Sanjeev Khera Vs Additional Director General (Adjudication) (CESTAT Delhi)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Courts
- All CESTAT, CESTAT Delhi
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Advertisement
Sanjeev Khera Vs Additional Director General (Adjudication) (CESTAT Delhi)
The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Delhi, considered whether penalties imposed under Rule 26 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002 could be sustained against five appellants. The appellants argued that the impugned order did not confiscate the goods and also did not contain any finding that the goods were liable to confiscation. They submitted that the order merely stated, while imposing penalties, that the goods were liable to confiscation.
The department supported the penalti...





