Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Arundhati Dnyandeo Kalane Vs ITO (ITAT Pune)
Related Assessment Year : 2013-14
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Arundhati Dnyandeo Kalane Vs ITO (ITAT Pune) ITAT Pune Deletes ₹73.62 Lakh Section 69 Addition Based on Seized Material Belonging to Earlier Year The Pune Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) decided the assessee’s appeal for AY 2013-14, arising from a reassessment under sections 147/144/144B, wherein an addition of ₹73.62 lakh was made under section 69 towards alleged unexplained investment in purchase of a flat. At the outset, the Tribunal condoned a delay of 363 days in filing the appeal, accepting the assessee’s explanation of non-receipt of notices due to email commun...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

No Mens Rea, No Misconduct: ICAI Clears CA in Alleged Bribery Trap Case CA Not Liable for Client’s Bogus Entries: ICAI Clears Accountant with No Certification Role Suspicion ≠ Proof: ICAI Clears CA in Alleged Multi-Bank Loan Fraud Case Delayed Retraction Backfires: ICAI Finds CA Guilty in Bogus Donation Tax Evasion Scheme Admission Seals Fate: ICAI Reprimands CA in Bogus Political Donation Scam View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
April 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930