Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Arundhati Dnyandeo Kalane Vs ITO (ITAT Pune)
Related Assessment Year : 2013-14
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Arundhati Dnyandeo Kalane Vs ITO (ITAT Pune) ITAT Pune Deletes ₹73.62 Lakh Section 69 Addition Based on Seized Material Belonging to Earlier Year The Pune Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) decided the assessee’s appeal for AY 2013-14, arising from a reassessment under sections 147/144/144B, wherein an addition of ₹73.62 lakh was made under section 69 towards alleged unexplained investment in purchase of a flat. At the outset, the Tribunal condoned a delay of 363 days in filing the appeal, accepting the assessee’s explanation of non-receipt of notices due to email commun...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penny Stock Addition Fails: ITAT Says Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence Borrowed Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Additions in Multiple Family Cases Statement Alone Cannot Justify ‘On-Money’ Addition: ITAT Mumbai Genuine ITR Mistake Cannot Lead to Tax on Wrong Income: ITAT Mumbai AO Cannot Reopen on the Same Material Examined in U/s 153C Assessment: ITAT Quashes ₹2.90 Crore Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930