Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Khadakala Seva Sahkari Mandali Ltd. Vs ITO (ITAT Rajkot)
Related Assessment Year : 2018-19
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download. Already Upgraded? Login here to access.
Khadakala Seva Sahkari Mandali Ltd. Vs ITO (ITAT Rajkot) Belated Return, Belated Appeal: Without Condonation Petition Proves Fatal-Tribunal Refuses to Condoned 300-Day Delay—80P Claim Dies at Threshold Assessee filed appeal against CPC intimation u/s 143(1) disallowing deduction of ₹3,58,271/- u/s 80P on the ground that return was filed belatedly on 27.03.2019, much beyond due date of 31.08.2018. CIT(A) dismissed the appeal on merits as well. Before Tribunal, notice of hearing was duly served, yet no appearance was made; no adjournment request was filed; and crucially, no petition for cond...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Defect in Section 143(2) Notice Format Is Curable Under Section 292B: ITAT Bangalore Cash Loan Enforceable Under NI Act Despite Section 269SS Breach: SC Kolkata ITAT Quashes Assessment as Section 143(2) Notice Was Without Jurisdiction BSNL VRS-2019 Ex-gratia Fully Exempt Under Section 10(10B): Surat ITAT Patna ITAT Deletes Search Additions Based on Retracted Statements & Estimates View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
July 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031