The analysis highlights how GST law forces recipients to pay suppliers within 180 days while still exposing them to ITC denial if suppliers default. It contends that the provision imposes an impossible burden on compliant taxpayers.
The Court held that Members of Parliament and other constitutional authorities are entitled to the honorific “Hon’ble” under established protocol. It clarified that personal familiarity or grievances cannot justify omission of the recognized honorific.
The article explains how the Government replaced the PDF-based Annexure-B with a structured JSON utility for GST refund applications. The new system enables automated invoice-level validations and technology-driven refund processing.
The Bombay High Court ruled that GST authorities cannot create a negative balance in the Electronic Credit Ledger while blocking ITC under Rule 86A.
The paper examines how India’s corporate governance framework, despite strong statutory provisions, continues to suffer from implementation gaps and ethical failures. It highlights that formal compliance alone cannot prevent governance breakdowns like Satyam and IL&FS.
The article explains how transit anticipatory bail evolved through judicial interpretation to protect individuals facing arrest in another state. It highlights that courts treat personal liberty under Article 21 as paramount and grant temporary protection to enable access to the competent court.
The Department of Posts launched Personalized Cheque Books for POSA customers with pre-printed account details and IFSC information. The move aims to improve customer convenience, enhance security, and modernize postal banking services.
ROC Pune penalized a company and its directors for delayed filing of Form PAS-3 under Section 42(8) of the Companies Act, 2013. The authority held that delayed filing of return of allotment attracts a separate penalty under Section 42(9).
ROC Pune penalized a company and its directors for delayed filing of Form MGT-14 under Section 117 of the Companies Act, 2013. The authority granted reduced penalties after recognizing the company as a start-up eligible for Section 446B benefits.
ROC Pune held that procedural lapses in a private placement issue related to one integrated transaction and did not warrant multiple penalties. The authority accepted the company’s contention that Section 42(10) does not contemplate separate penalties for each procedural deviation.
