This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Negative ITC Blocking Illegal as Rule 86A Covers Only Available Credit: Bombay HC
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Hemang Bipin Varaiya Vs State of Maharashtra & Ors. (Bombay High Court)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Courts
- All High Courts, Bombay High Court
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Hemang Bipin Varaiya Vs State of Maharashtra & Ors. (Bombay High Court)
Summary: The Bombay High Court held that Rule 86A of the CGST/MGST Rules does not permit “negative blocking” of Input Tax Credit (ITC) where no sufficient balance exists in the Electronic Credit Ledger (ECL). The petitioner challenged the blocking of ITC amounting to Rs. 4.82 crore on the ground that the department created a negative balance despite inadequate credit being available in the ledger. The Court observed that Rule 86A of CGST Rules 2017 can be invoked only to the extent of credit actually available in t...






