ITAT Mumbai held that proceedings u/s. 153A of the Income Tax Act is bad in law since case falls within parameters of rule 112F r.w. third proviso to section 153A, however, no certificate was issued by investigating officer even when cash was found during election period.
Supreme Court quashes rape charges, stating consensual relationships ending poorly are not rape. Emphasizes misuse of law and lack of false promise.
View the Company Secretaries Examination timetable for December 2025, including Executive & Professional Programme subjects and key dates.
Supreme Court rules Section 197 CrPC sanction not needed to prosecute police killing civilians in plain clothes with official guns, citing lack of duty nexus.
ITAT Mumbai held that no disallowance u/s. 14A of the Income Tax Act r.w.r. 8D(2)(ii) due to availability of sufficient interest free funds for the purpose of making investment in exempt income yielding assets.
A recent advisory from Infosys GSTN, the technology backbone of India’s Goods and Services Tax (GST) network, addressing a persistent GSTR-1 filing issue, has drawn sharp criticism and ridicule from tax professionals and businesses alike.
Gujarat High Court held that order cancelling GST registration for non-filing of GST return set aside since tax along with interest and penalty already paid and petitioner is ready and willing to abide by the provisions of GST Act and Rules.
IBBI dismissed an RTI appeal on June 16, 2025, citing that requested internal records were either already shared or not held as per RTI Act provisions.
India’s income tax filing season for Assessment Year (AY) 2025-26 (Financial Year 2024-25) is off to a rocky start, marked by significant delays in form releases, minimal processing of filed returns, and new mandates causing concerns among taxpayers and professionals alike. Social media platforms are abuzz with complaints, highlighting a growing frustration with the Income Tax Department’s preparedness.
Gujarat High Court held that Revisional authority ought to have taken into consideration that AO has to pass best judgement assessment order without granting an opportunity of being heard. Thus, matter remanded back to AO for de novo consideration.
