ITAT Mumbai rules in favor of B. Braun Medical India, deleting ₹2 Cr addition u/s 68, citing it as an advance payment, not unexplained credit.
ITAT Pune remands appeal for reconsideration, citing leniency for a senior citizen taxpayer’s advance tax shortfall. Case to be decided on merits.
ITAT Ahmedabad remands Hari Krushna Machintech Pvt Ltd’s appeals to CIT(A) for reassessment. Issues include ex-parte dismissal and addition for bogus purchases.
Punjab and Haryana High Court refused to de-freeze bank account of company alleged to have dishonestly induced individuals/ investors to invest in cloud particles thus involved in scheduled offences under Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002.
IFSCA revises eligibility norms for Remote Trading Participants in IFSC stock exchanges, addressing market feedback and modifying onboarding conditions.
ITAT Delhi sets aside search assessment in Amit Gupta & Sons HUF case, citing lack of proper approval under Section 153D of the Income Tax Act.
CESTAT Ahmedabad rules that refund claims must clearly specify the notification and legal provision under which they are sought. Procedural lapses can lead to denial.
ITAT Agra restores penalty appeal in Devendra Kumar Dubey Vs ITO for reassessment by CIT(A). Case highlights concealment penalty of ₹34,803 under Section 271(1)(c).
Madras High Court held that Section 10-A of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 cannot be extended to cases where default continued beyond moratorium period. Hence, application under section 7 for initiation of CIRP acceptable.
ITAT Delhi held that interest on enhanced compensation under section 28 of Land Acquisition Act, 1894 is not exempt u/s. 10(37). Such interest is exigible to tax u/s. 56(2)(viii) r.w.s. 145B(1). Accordingly, appeal of the assessee dismissed.
