Delhi ITAT ruled that once the Income Tax Officer accepts income based on depreciation plus 15% markup, denying cost is unjust. Full analysis here.
Explore the adjudication order under Section 92 of the Companies Act, 2013 against Winstaar Enterprises for non-filing of annual returns. Understand the penalties, legal obligations, and implications.
Anjana Foundation Vadodara vs A.O.: Ahmedabad ITAT clarifies that advance filing of Form 10B isn’t mandatory for claiming exemption under Sections 11 & 12.
These regulations may be called the Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority of India (Actuarial, Finance and Investment Functions of Insurers) Regulations, 2024.
Read about the adjudication order by the Ministry of Corporate Affairs penalizing Winstaar Enterprises for non-filing of financial statements under Section 137 of the Companies Act, 2013.
Read about the adjudication order under Section 92 of the Companies Act, 2013 for M/s Tycoons Mall Retail Private Limited. Penalties, violations, and consequences.
Anamika Kala Sangam vs. DCIT: Kolkata ITAT ruling allows organisations to claim expenses against gross receipts, even if not entitled to Section 11 benefits. Read more.
Explore the adjudication order by the Registrar of Companies, Tamil Nadu, Chennai, imposing a penalty on Mr. B. Kannan for holding directorships in violation of Section 165 of the Companies Act, 2013.
Learn why compliance reviews are crucial for SMEs in today’s business landscape. Mitigate risks, build trust, gain a competitive edge, and enhance operational efficiency.
In the case of ACIT Vs Aaryavart Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd., the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) Ahmedabad ruled that mere maintenance of a bank account with a social co-operative bank cannot be a basis for assuming that the assessee is engaged in accommodation entries. Get insights into the case and the tribunal’s decision.
