ITAT Delhi rules addition u/s 69A for excess jewelry during a search operation unsustainable as the assessee belonged to a wealthy family and received jewelry on occasions
Stay informed about the latest IFSCA circular amending reporting norms for Fund Management Entities. Quarterly reporting now mandatory. Read the details here
Introduction: The Ministry of Finance, Department of Economic Affairs, issued a significant notification on November 3rd, 2023. This notification, G.S.R. 818(E), introduces amendments to the National Savings Recurring Deposit Scheme 2019. The amendments encompass changes in repayment amounts, maturity periods, and provisions for legal heirs or nominees. In this article, we will delve into the […]
Cenvat Credit on Input or Capital Goods could not be denied merely for showing tubes and flaps separately in invoices. Moreover, tubes and flaps were used in the manufacture of the tyres and as such qualify to be “inputs” given the definition given under Rule 2(k) of CCR, 2004.
Delhi High Court held the reassessment proceedings under section 148 of the Income Tax Act as liable to be set aside as AO failed to demonstrate that explanation given by the assessee was deficient.
Get insights into GST implications on lease renewal and premium payments. Key rulings on Reverse Charge Mechanism, collection from shareholders, and more.
Applicant before us is not supplier of service and that ruling sought is not for admissibility of input tax credit in respect of supply received by applicant.
Dive into GST implications of converting raw materials for Shree Avani Pharma. Analysis of AAR Gujarat’s ruling on SAC 9988 and GST rates at 12%
AAR held that amount deposited by the applicant (75%) in escrow account against bank guarantee pending outcome of the further challenge against Arbitral Award or dissatisfaction against DAB decision, is not liable to GST
Jammu-Kashmir and Ladakh High Court held that as the seizure of shawls containing prohibited material took place in Delhi, therefore, Delhi Court will be having jurisdiction in the matter and not the court of Jammu-Kashmir and Ladakh.
