Separate Invoicing for Tubes and Flaps Doesn’t Affect Cenvat Credit

Goodyear India Ltd. Vs Commissioner of Central Excise (CESTAT Chandigarh)

No cenvat credit on Inputs or Capital Goods could be denied merely for showing Tubes and Flaps separately in Invoices

Conclusion:  Cenvat Credit on Input or Capital Goods could not be denied merely for showing tubes and flaps separately in invoices. Moreover, tubes and flaps were used in the manufacture of the tyres and as such qualify to be “inputs” given the definition given under Rule 2(k) of CCR, 2004.

He

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.