Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Goodyear India Ltd. Vs Commissioner of Central Excise (CESTAT Chandigarh)
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Goodyear India Ltd. Vs Commissioner of Central Excise (CESTAT Chandigarh) No cenvat credit on Inputs or Capital Goods could be denied merely for showing Tubes and Flaps separately in Invoices Conclusion:  Cenvat Credit on Input or Capital Goods could not be denied merely for showing tubes and flaps separately in invoices. Moreover, tubes and flaps were used in the manufacture of the tyres and as such qualify to be “inputs” given the definition given under Rule 2(k) of CCR, 2004. Held: Assessee was engaged in the manufacture of tyres. It purchased tubes and flaps from other manufacturers a...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930