Your attention is invited to the decision of the Supreme Court in the case of Mediwell Hospital & Health Centre Pvt. Ltd vs. Union of India reported in 1997 (89) ELT 425 (SC) = 1997 (68) ECR 750 (SC). The court held that the exemption Notification No. 64/88-Cus cast continuous obligation on the part of the importers to give free treatment at least to 40% of the outdoor patients as well as to give
The principal notification was published in the Gazette of India, Extraordinary, vide notification No. 16/2000-Customs, dated the 1st March, 2000.
In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (2) of section 9A of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975 (51 of 1975) read with rule 13 of the Customs Tariff (Identification, Assessment and Collection of Anti-dumping duty on Dumped Articles and for Determination of Injury) Rules, 1995, the Central Government hereby rescinds the notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Finance (Department of Revenue), No. 44/2000-Customs, dated the 17th April, 2000.
WHEREAS on the basis of the aforesaid findings of the designated authority, the Central Government had imposed an anti-dumping duty vide notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Finance (Department of Revenue), No. 44/2000-Customs, dated the 17th April, 2000, published in Part II, Section 3, Sub-section (i) of the Gazette of India, Extraordinary, dated the 17th April, 2000 vide G.S.R. No. 39(E), dated the 17th April, 2000.
In exercise of powers conferred by sub-section (1) of section 9A of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975 (51 of 1975), read with rules 18 and 20 of the Customs Tariff (Identification, Assessment and Collection of Anti-dumping Duty on Dumped Articles and for Determination of Injury) Rules, 1995, the Central Government hereby rescinds the notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Finance (Department of Revenue), No.97/96-Customs, dated the 20th day of December, 1996.
Therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of section 9A of the said Customs Tariff Act, read with sub-sections (5) and (6) of the said section 9A and rule 23 of the Customs Tariff (Identification, Assessment and Collection of Anti-dumping Duty on Dumped Articles and for Determination of Injury) Rules, 1995.
I am directed to invite your attention to the above mentioned subject. It has been brought to the notice of the Board that the existing arrangements require certain modifications so as to facilitate the work relating to EOUs
Notification No. 11469-Income Tax In the notification of the Government of India, in the Ministry of Finance (Department of Revenue) (Foreign Tax Division), number S.O. 650 (E), dated the 10th July, 2000, published in the Gazette of India, Extraordinary, Part II, Section 3, sub-section (ii), dated the 10th July, 2000 [published at (2000) 161 CTR (St) 63]
It is directed to refer to the subject mentioned above and to state that the matter regarding classification of CD-Writer was discussed in the Conference of Commissioners of Customs on Tariff and Allied matters held at Chennai on 21st and 22nd Jan., 2000. As contrary views were expressed regarding classification, the Conference consultation that the matter would be examined by the Board in
It is directed to refer to the Boards Circular No. 53/99-Customs, dated the 24th August, 1999 on above-mentioned subject. The said Circular was issued to enforce the licensing requirements of the Sections 406/407 of the Marine Shipping Act, 1958 for foreign flag vessels which call at Indian Ports. It has been pointed out by the Directorate general of Shipping, Ministry of Surface Transport that in
