Follow Us:

Notifications/Circulars

Circular No. 812/09/2005-Central Excise, Dated: 22.03.2005

March 22, 2005 391 Views 0 comment Print

I am directed to refer to Circular No. 784/17/2004-CX dated 30.04.2004 on the above subject which directed the field formations to keep show cause notices pertaining to above issue pending until the department’s SLP was finally decided by the Hon’ble Supreme Court

Revised Norms for Execution of Bond and Bank Guarantee under Advance Licence and EPCG Schemes -Reg

March 22, 2005 685 Views 0 comment Print

The undersigned is directed to invite attention to Board’s Circular No.58/2004-Cus. dated 21.10.2004 on the above subject and to say that a doubt has been raised as to whether a Surety is to be furnished alongwith Bond in the case of imports by Star Export Houses, Public Sector Undertakings etc. {vide para 3.1(a) to (e)} under Advance Licence and EPCG Schemes. It has been represented that since established exporters, Star Export Houses and Public Sector Undertakings have large volume of imports under Advance Licence and EPCG Schemes, it becomes difficult for them in arranging Sureties by another firm or person for each & every import. Besides, it adds to transaction cost. It has, therefore, been requested that the requirement of Surety for execution of Bond under Advance Licence and EPCG Schemes should be dispensed with in the case of Star Export Houses, Public Sector Undertakings etc., as available earlier under Circular No.79/2003-Cus. dated 4.9.2003 (since superceded). The undersigned is directed to invite attention to Board’s Circular No.58/2004-Cus. dated 21.10.2004 on the above subject and to say that a doubt has been raised as to whether a Surety is to be furnished alongwith Bond in the case of imports by Star Export Houses, Public Sector Undertakings etc. {vide para 3.1(a) to (e)} under Advance Licence and EPCG Schemes. It has been represented that since established exporters, Star Export Houses and Public Sector Undertakings have large volume of imports under Advance Licence and EPCG Schemes, it becomes difficult for them in arranging Sureties by another firm or person for each & every import. Besides, it adds to transaction cost. It has, therefore, been requested that the requirement of Surety for execution of Bond under Advance Licence and EPCG Schemes should be dispensed with in the case of Star Export Houses, Public Sector Undertakings etc., as available earlier under Circular No.79/2003-Cus. dated 4.9.2003 (since superceded). The undersigned is directed to invite attention to Board’s Circular No.58/2004-Cus. dated 21.10.2004 on the above subject and to say that a doubt has been raised as to whether a Surety is to be furnished alongwith Bond in the case of imports by Star Export Houses, Public Sector Undertakings etc. {vide para 3.1(a) to (e)} under Advance Licence and EPCG Schemes. It has been represented that since established exporters, Star Export Houses and Public Sector Undertakings have large volume of imports under Advance Licence and EPCG Schemes, it becomes difficult for them in arranging Sureties by another firm or person for each & every import. Besides, it adds to transaction cost. It has, therefore, been requested that the requirement of Surety for execution of Bond under Advance Licence and EPCG Schemes should be dispensed with in the case of Star Export Houses, Public Sector Undertakings etc., as available earlier under Circular No.79/2003-Cus. dated 4.9.2003 (since superceded). The undersigned is directed to invite attention to Board’s Circular No.58/2004-Cus. dated 21.10.2004 on the above subject and to say that a doubt has been raised as to whether a Surety is to be furnished alongwith Bond in the case of imports by Star Export Houses, Public Sector Undertakings etc. {vide para 3.1(a) to (e)} under Advance Licence and EPCG Schemes. It has been represented that since established exporters, Star Export Houses and Public Sector Undertakings have large volume of imports under Advance Licence and EPCG Schemes, it becomes difficult for them in arranging Sureties by another firm or person for each & every import. Besides, it adds to transaction cost. It has, therefore, been requested that the requirement of Surety for execution of Bond under Advance Licence and EPCG Schemes should be dispensed with in the case of Star Export Houses, Public Sector Undertakings etc., as available earlier under Circular No.79/2003-Cus. dated 4.9.2003 (since superceded). The undersigned is directed to invite attention to Board’s Circular No.58/2004-Cus. dated 21.10.2004 on the above subject and to say that a doubt has been raised as to whether a Surety is to be furnished alongwith Bond in the case of imports by Star Export Houses, Public Sector Undertakings etc. {vide para 3.1(a) to (e)} under Advance Licence and EPCG Schemes. It has been represented that since established exporters, Star Export Houses and Public Sector Undertakings have large volume of imports under Advance Licence and EPCG Schemes, it becomes difficult for them in arranging Sureties by another firm or person for each & every import. Besides, it adds to transaction cost. It has, therefore, been requested that the requirement of Surety for execution of Bond under Advance Licence and EPCG Schemes should be dispensed with in the case of Star Export Houses, Public Sector Undertakings etc., as available earlier under Circular No.79/2003-Cus. dated 4.9.2003 (since superceded). The undersigned is directed to invite attention to Board’s Circular No.58/2004-Cus. dated 21.10.2004 on the above subject and to say that a doubt has been raised as to whether a Surety is to be furnished alongwith Bond in the case of imports by Star Export Houses, Public Sector Undertakings etc. {vide para 3.1(a) to (e)} under Advance Licence and EPCG Schemes. It has been represented that since established exporters, Star Export Houses and Public Sector Undertakings have large volume of imports under Advance Licence and EPCG Schemes, it becomes difficult for them in arranging Sureties by another firm or person for each & every import. Besides, it adds to transaction cost. It has, therefore, been requested that the requirement of Surety for execution of Bond under Advance Licence and EPCG Schemes should be dispensed with in the case of Star Export Houses, Public Sector Undertakings etc., as available earlier under Circular No.79/2003-Cus. dated 4.9.2003 (since superceded).

Public Notice No. 62/2004-2009, Dated: 21.03.2005

March 21, 2005 352 Views 0 comment Print

This entry is valid for 6 months w.e.f date of issue of this Public Notice or the date of withdrawal of DEPB scheme (in case the scheme is withdrawn), whichever is earlier. Further the entry is valid for the exports effected by M/s. Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd., Mumbai only.

Imposition of definitive anti duping duty on import of mica pearl pigment

March 21, 2005 808 Views 0 comment Print

Therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1), read with sub-section (5) of section 9A of the said Customs Tariff Act, and rules 18 and 20 of the Customs Tariff (Identification, Assessment and Collection of Anti-dumping Duty on Dumped Articles and for Determination of Injury) Rules, 1995.

Circular No.19/2005-Custom Duty, dated: 21.03.2005

March 21, 2005 2179 Views 0 comment Print

I am directed to invite your attention to the above subject and to say that a doubt has been raised as to whether the All Industry Rate of duty drawback is to be denied / reduced on export goods using inputs some of which are non-duty paid. It has been represented that the All Industry Rate of duty drawback is sought to be denied / reduced on floor coverings and made ups on the ground that a part of yarn used has not suffered any duty.

Notification No. 30 (RE-2004)/2004-2009, Dated: 17.03.2005

March 17, 2005 373 Views 0 comment Print

NOTIFICATION NO. 30 (RE-2004)/2004-2009 Central Government hereby makes the following amendments in the Notification No.21/( 2004-2009) dated 10.2.2005 :-

Notification No.81/2005 – Income Tax Dated 17/3/2005

March 17, 2005 453 Views 0 comment Print

Notification No.81/2005 – Income Tax It is notified for general information that the enterprise/undertaking, Hazira Port Pvt Ltd, 101-103, Abhijeet II, Mithakali Circle, Ahmedabad-380006, has been approved by the Central Government for the purpose of section 10(23G) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, read with rule 2E of the Income-tax Rules, 1962 for their project of development, maintenance and operation of

Notification No.80/2005 – Income Tax Dated 17/3/2005

March 17, 2005 360 Views 0 comment Print

Notification No.80/2005 – Income Tax It is hereby notified for general information that the organization Rajiv Gandhi Foundation, Jawahar Bhawan, Dr. Rajendra Prasad Road, New Delhi has been approved by the Central Government for the period from 1.4.2003 to 31.3.2006, for the purpose of clause (iii) of sub-section (1) of section 35 of the Income tax Act, 1961, read with Rule 6 of the Income tax Rules, 1962

Notification No.79/2005 – Income Tax Dated 17/3/2005

March 17, 2005 459 Views 0 comment Print

Notification No.79/2005 – Income Tax It is notified for general information that the approval to the enterprise, listed at para (3) below has been renewed by the Central Government for the purpose of section 10(23G) of the Income tax Act, 1961, read with rule 2E of the Income tax Rules, 1962 with effect from the Asstt. Year 2002-2003 to the Asstt. Year 2015-16 (upto 29.11.2014) i.e. upto the end of period of 20 years as

Application Deadline for Duty Free Credit Extended

March 17, 2005 391 Views 0 comment Print

The deadline for filing Duty Free Credit Entitlement applications for Status Holders has been extended to three months after Appendix-17D is issued.

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930