Delhi Public School Ghaziabad Vs ACIT (ITAT Delhi) The assessee did not provide transport facility to the outsiders and was providing the same only to the students and the staff working for the society. Since transport facility was incidental to achieve the object of providing education, i.e., the object of the society, therefore, the transport […]
Seller has agreed to sell, transfer, convey, assign and deliver to the applicant or to any affiliates as directed by applicant for the BPL business which would be transferred as a slump sale on going concern basis. BPL business means BP business, LS Business and PM business as going concern as outlined in ‘Definitions and Interpretations’.
Armour Steel Buildings India (P) Ltd. Vs Asstt. State Tax Officer (Kerala High Court) The petitioner, an assessee under the GST Act in Tamil Nadu, sent goods across to the State. The Assistant State Tax Officer intercepted the goods and detained them. After the initial procedural formalities the petitioner suffered an order under section 129 […]
Sushila N. Rungta Vs TRO (Supreme Court) What has been argued by Mr. R. Venkataramani, learned senior counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant, is that considering that the Gold Control Act itself has been repealed without a saving clause, Section 6 of the General Clauses Act would not apply for the reason that the […]
M/s C.R. Auluck & Sons Pvt. Ltd. Vs ACIT (ITAT Chandigarh) Assessee has failed to establish its case of commercial expediency. The intention of assessee in advancing the said interest-free loan to its sister concern was not for the purpose of business because the two concerns were carrying on independent lines of manufacturing and the […]
Explanation 3C to section 43B provides that interest payable can only be allowed to an assessee when the same is actually paid and any interest which has been converted into a loan shall not be deemed to have been actually paid.
DCIT Vs M/s Reckitt Benckiser (India) Ltd. (ITAT Kolkata) We come to Revenue’s appeal. Its sole grievance reads that the CIT(A) has erred in law and as facts in allowing arrears Section 80IB and 80IC deduction claims totaling to Rs. 1,39,48,12,000/- thereby reversing Assessing Officer’s action not taking any cognizance thereof solely for the reason […]
Sanjaykumar Footermal Jain Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai) In the instant case it is crystal clear that by virtue of agreement for sale dt. 24-04-2008, and making a part payment, the assessee has acquired irrevocable tight, title and interest including possession in the house property in the form of Godown. The registration of the property which […]
Appellant was prevented by sufficient cause not to let out this property. Therefore, the Notional Income from the said property lying vacant due to Act of Government cannot be added back.
Ramchandran Ananthan Pothi Vs UOI and Ors. (Bombay High Court) In the event, the petitioner seeks a stay of the order passed by the Assessment Officer by making a stay application, then, during the pendency of such application, the criminal prosecution Section 276(C)(1) of the Income Tax Act 1961 should not be launched and, if it has been already launched, the same shall not proceed. […]
