SC explains Effect of repeal of a statute u/s 6 of General Clauses Act on pending proceedings

Sushila N. Rungta Vs TRO (Supreme Court)

What has been argued by Mr. R. Venkataramani, learned senior counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant, is that considering that the Gold Control Act itself has been repealed without a saving clause, Section 6 of the General Clauses Act would not apply for the reason that the objects and reasons show that the Act was sought to be repealed without any saving clause. He relied strongly upon the objects and reasons using the expression “regressive” and the fact that

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.