Against the order dated 30.11.2017 the petitioner has an statutory efficacious alternative remedy of filing an appeal under Section 107 of the U.P. Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017 read with Rule 109 A of the Rules.
Petitioner has equally efficacious remedy of filing an appeal against the penalty order under Section 107 of the U.P. GST Act, 2017. It is left open to the petitioner to take recourse to the statutory remedy available to him under the law. We are not inclined to entertain this petition at this stage.
RK Overseas Vs UOI & Ors (Allahabad High Court) On the conjoint reading of sections 107 and 121 of the Act it is thus apparent that though all orders passed under the Act by the adjudicating authority are appealable but not the ones which have been specifically excluded from the purview of appeal under section […]
M/s. Haryana Freight Carrier (P) Ltd. Vs State of UP (High Court Allahabad) The petitioner being transporter has on wrong advice downloaded the transit declaration Form which was prescribed under the VAT Act and has no role so far as the transaction in question is concerned, which is covered by the provisions of the CGST, […]
Whether the supply of transportation services, (two separate agreements with respect to the supply of goods and services), will be exempt from the levy of GST in terms of SI. no. 18 of the Notification No. 12/2017?
In re M/s. P.K. Agarwala (GST AAR Jharkhand) The term Earth Work has not been defined under any GST provisions. The Webster Dictionary defines Earth Work as ” an embankment or construction made of earth specially one used as a field fortification. The Collins dictionary defines Earth Work as “excavation of earth as in engineering construction; […]
Sri Mangal Murty Marketing Vs State of Maharastra (High Court Bombay) As a result, perusal of the Lotteries (Regulation) Act 1988 only regulates the lotteries and the Regulation is in form of the stipulation of terms and conditions when the Government organizes, conduct or promotes a lottery. The intention of the Parliament in introducing Section […]
Interest income earned by assessee engaged in money lending in a systematic manner had to be taxed as business income in spite of the fact that assessee was not having registration with RBI as NBFC.
In re Sanjog Steels Pvt. Ltd. (GST AAR Rajasthan) 1. The supply from M/s. SSPL to M/s. X on a ‘Bill to Ship to’ mode as per provisions of Section 10(1) (b) of IGST Act, 2017 is permissible. 2. The applicant can issue an e-way bill in which the ‘bill to’ will be mentioned in […]
In re Pawanputra Travels (GST AAR Rajasthan) The applicable GST rate on supply of non-air-conditioned vehicles on hire to Indian Army? The Service provided by the applicant is not exempted under Notification No. 12/2017 dated 28.06.2017 as this Service does not fall under ‘non-airconditioned contract carriage’ category. The service provided is ‘rent a cab’ Service, […]
