Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : M/s. Haryana Freight Carrier (P) Ltd. Vs State of UP (High Court Allahabad)
Appeal Number : Writ Tax No. 579 of 2018
Date of Judgement/Order : 04/04/2018
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

M/s. Haryana Freight Carrier (P) Ltd. Vs State of UP (High Court Allahabad)

The petitioner being transporter has on wrong advice downloaded the transit declaration Form which was prescribed under the VAT Act and has no role so far as the transaction in question is concerned, which is covered by the provisions of the CGST, Act, 2017.  Since the assessee was a transport company and was not registered as a dealer at any place, therefore, it was directed to deposit the sum estimated by the seizing authority as liability of tax, for release of the seized goods and vehicle.

FULL TEXT OF THE HIGH COURT ORDER / JUDGMENT

Heard Sri Nitin Kesarwani, Sri M.M. Rai, learned counsel for the petitioner. Sri C.B. Tripathi, learned Special Counsel for the State and Sri Anant Kumar Tiwari, learned Standing Counsel for the Union of India.

The instant writ petition has been filed by the petitioner-M/S Haryana Freight Carrier (P). Ltd., which is a Transport Company, carrying on the business of transportation of goods from one place to another.

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031