The Allahabad High Court invalidated proceedings under Section 129 of the CGST Act after finding that only a chassis was being moved for refurbishment and no goods were loaded in the vehicle.
The Gujarat High Court set aside GST detention proceedings after finding that the final order was passed beyond the mandatory seven-day period prescribed under Section 129(3) of the CGST Act. The ruling reiterates that statutory timelines in detention cases must be strictly followed.
The Delhi High Court held that reassessment proceedings for AY 2013-14 were valid since the limitation period stood extended till 30 June 2021 under TOLA.
The Calcutta High Court set aside the order passed under Section 148A(d) after holding that failure to grant a personal hearing amounted to violation of principles of natural justice.
Eempt income, which were disallowed under Section 14A could not be automatically added back to compute the book profit for Minimum Alternate Tax (MAT) under Section 115JB without pinpointing real, actual expenditures recorded in the books of accounts by tax authorities that possess a direct nexus with the tax-free earnings.
The CCI held that allegations relating to vehicle permits, GST remittance, and transport rule violations fall outside the scope of competition law. The Commission found no prima facie abuse of dominance under Section 4 of the Competition Act.
The Supreme Court refused to interfere with the Bombay High Court ruling that transfer of MIDC leasehold rights amounts to transfer of benefits arising from immovable property and is not liable to GST. The judgment also held that such assignment is not a supply of services under the CGST Act.
Delhi High Court held that disputes relating to GST refund rejection and appreciation of evidence should be pursued through the statutory appellate remedy under Section 112 of the CGST Act. The Court declined writ interference as GSTAT was functional and operational.
Punjab and Haryana High Court held that once a resolution plan is approved under Section 31 of the IBC, tax demands not included in the plan stand extinguished. The Court set aside the assessment order, demand notice, and penalty proceedings.
The Bombay High Court granted a fresh hearing where GST recovery proceedings were initiated against the son for alleged tax dues of his deceased father. The Court held that all contentions, including challenge to statutory provisions, would remain open.
