The Tribunal held that reopening based solely on an NMS alert and without examining DTAA-exempt interest income violated Section 115A(5). The ruling confirms that non-residents cannot be reassessed when TDS-deducted income does not escape tax.
The Tribunal held that notices and assessment orders in the name of a deceased person have no legal standing, confirming that reassessment requires a living assessee or representative.
The ₹8.49 lakh credited for household expenditure from husband was deleted as non-taxable. The unexplained ₹17.80 lakh in the capital account is sent back to the AO for proper verification and opportunity to furnish evidence.
A clear breakdown of the new disclosures, including ITC reporting in Tables 6A1 and 8A, and how they affect reconciliation for FY 2024-25. Key takeaway: taxpayers must manage additional cross-year ITC tracking.
The Court held that amounts paid under protest before assessment must be considered when calculating the 10% pre-deposit required under Section 26(6A) of the MVAT Act. The ruling restores the appeal and confirms that the statute must be interpreted strictly as written.
The Tribunal held that Section 87A contains no exclusion for long-term capital gains and allowed the rebate since total income remained below Rs.5 lakhs. The order of the lower authorities was set aside.
The Court held that GST registration cannot be restored solely to claim ITC under Section 16(6) when the taxpayer voluntarily cancelled registration. The ruling confirms that Section 16(6) applies only where cancellation has been lawfully revoked.
ITAT Ahmedabad held that reassessment under Section 147 cannot be based on vague or unverified information; specific transactions must be identified to justify additions.
Court orders full compensation to a passenger injured due to crowd pressure in a general coach, emphasizing systemic failures in boarding and deboarding safety.
The Court held that a genuine mistake caused by a misprint in a widely used tax publication justified condoning a 509-day delay in filing Form 9A. The rejection orders were quashed and relief granted under Section 119(2)(b).
