Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Deepali Kapoor Vs ITO (ITAT Hyderabad)
Related Assessment Year : 2022-23
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Deepali Kapoor Vs ITO (ITAT Hyderabad) Section 68 Cannot Apply to Household Support from Husband; Second Credit Explanation Contradictory—₹8.49 Lakh Deleted, ₹17.80 Lakh Remanded The Assessee filed return for AY 2022-23 declaring NIL income. During scrutiny, AO noticed ₹2.80 crore credited in her capital account. The Assessee stated it was received from her husband. On verification, AO found only ₹2,62,20,000 actually received, leaving an unverified difference of ₹17,80,000, which was added as unexplained cash credit u/s 68. AO also added ₹8,49,650 received from husband towards h...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penny Stock Addition Fails: ITAT Says Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence Borrowed Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Additions in Multiple Family Cases Statement Alone Cannot Justify ‘On-Money’ Addition: ITAT Mumbai Genuine ITR Mistake Cannot Lead to Tax on Wrong Income: ITAT Mumbai AO Cannot Reopen on the Same Material Examined in U/s 153C Assessment: ITAT Quashes ₹2.90 Crore Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930