Circular No. 547/43/2000-CX I am directed to say that certain doubts have been raised as to mode of payment of duty by a manufacture claiming to be in the small scale sector which may be having one or more than one unit specially where he may be manufacturing branded goods for others on job work basis in one or both of the units. It is pertinent to note that where as for the rate of duty purposes, the value of clearences of one or more units is clubbed under SSi exemption scheme (like Notification no. 9/1999-Central Excise prior to 1.3.2000
Circular No. 795-Income Tax Under the existing provisions of clause (v) of the first proviso to sub-section (1) of section 139, a person not furnishing return under sub-section (1) and residing in specified areas and at any time during the previous year being the holder of a credit card, not being an add-on card, issued by any bank or institution, is required to furnish a return of his income during the previous year on or before the due date specified in the provision.
Circular No. 543/39/2000-CX A number of assessees are engaged in the manufacturer of V.P. Sugar and during the manufacture of sugar the press mud comes out as waste. The department has been contending that the party is required to pay an amount equal to 8% of the value of the press mud as per the provisions of Rule 57CC of Central Excise Rule 1944. On the other hand the tribunal in their various judgements has held that the assessees in question are the manufacturee of V.P. Sugar and press mud is only a residual waste
Your attention is invited to the decision of the Supreme Court in the case of Mediwell Hospital & Health Centre Pvt. Ltd vs. Union of India reported in 1997 (89) ELT 425 (SC) = 1997 (68) ECR 750 (SC). The court held that the exemption Notification No. 64/88-Cus cast continuous obligation on the part of the importers to give free treatment at least to 40% of the outdoor patients as well as to give
I am directed to invite your attention to the above mentioned subject. It has been brought to the notice of the Board that the existing arrangements require certain modifications so as to facilitate the work relating to EOUs
It is directed to refer to the subject mentioned above and to state that the matter regarding classification of CD-Writer was discussed in the Conference of Commissioners of Customs on Tariff and Allied matters held at Chennai on 21st and 22nd Jan., 2000. As contrary views were expressed regarding classification, the Conference consultation that the matter would be examined by the Board in
It is directed to refer to the Boards Circular No. 53/99-Customs, dated the 24th August, 1999 on above-mentioned subject. The said Circular was issued to enforce the licensing requirements of the Sections 406/407 of the Marine Shipping Act, 1958 for foreign flag vessels which call at Indian Ports. It has been pointed out by the Directorate general of Shipping, Ministry of Surface Transport that in
F. No. 345/2/2000-TRU A point has been raised that the CENVAT credit should be allowed in the event of additional demand of duty that may be confirmed against the manufacturer of inputs or capital goods. It has also been mentioned that in certain cases provisional assessment is resorted to on account of price escalation clause by way of an agreement between the buyer and the seller.
As a part of rationalisation of All Industry Rates of Duty Drawback, the SS No. 57.01 in Drawback Table, 1999-2000 relating to Floor Coverings, all sorts, has been trifurcated in the Drawback Table 2000-2001, into Woollen Floor Coverings (SS No. 57.01), Silk Floor Coverings (SS No. 57.03), and Synthetic Floor Coverings (SS No. 57.04), each having different drawback rate and drawback cap
Policy Circular No. 22 clarifies classification of specific products under ITC(HS) for exports and imports.
