Clarifies the import classification of Di-Butyl Phthalate and Di-Octyl Phthalate under Exim Code 29.17, not as plasticisers under Exim Code 3812.20.
Reference is invited to Policy Circular No. 25 (RE-2003)/2002-07 dated 28.1.2004 regarding 100% sampling of edible/food products under the PFA Act, the list of High risk food items is as under.
These have been examined by the Board, and necessary clarifications are given at Annexure -I enclosed. These may kindly be brought to the notice of all concerned through appropriate public notices.
The standard terms of contract as are required to be mentioned in the Contract Notes as per the Bye-laws and Regulations of exchanges, which are not contained in electronic contract notes, shall be incorporated in the Client Broker Agreement or where applicable,
In other words specified imported goods (including Polyester Texturised Yarn – PTY) are chargeable to NCCD twice-once as CVD under section 136 of the Finance Act 2003 and again as Customs duty under Section 134 of the Finance Act 2003. Vide Notification No. 77/2003-Cus. dated 14.5.2003, NCCD collected as CVD.
The Government liberalized the import of gold and silver in the policy initiative announced in January, 2004 vide DGFT”s Notification No. 29 (RE-2004)/2002-07, dated 28.1.2004, in as much as the import of these items was allowed without the requirement of an import license or in order words it was brought under OGL. However, under Notification No. 80/97-Cus. dated 21.10.1997.
DGFT clarifies renewal procedures for Status Holder Certificates expired on March 31, 2004, allowing benefits for exporters pending renewal applications.
The Ministry of Agriculture , Department of Agriculture and Cooperation vide Notification dated 31.5.2004 issued from F.No.8-128/2004-PPI ( copy enclosed), have deleted sub-clause 21 and 22 of clause 3 of the of Plant Quarantine (Regulation of Import into India) Order, 2003 with immediate effect .
I am directed to refer to Board’s Circular No.786/19/2004-CX dated 19.5.2004 and to state that inadvertently the district of Kancheepuram in the State of TamilNadu was omitted.
I am directed to state that doubts have been raised by field formations that whether goods manufactured using materials obtained without payment of duty for use in manufacture of export goods under notification No.43/2001-C.E.(N.T.) dated 26th June, 2001 as amended, can be exported under claim of rebate of duty under rule 18 of Central Excise Rules
