Income Tax : ITAT Mumbai held that an addition under Section 69A cannot be sustained when the assessee is denied the opportunity to cross-exami...
Income Tax : Income without satisfactory explanation is taxed at a special high rate under Section 115BBE. The provisions place strict liabilit...
Income Tax : Explains the centralization of digital platforms, surveillance powers, and opaque governance. Key takeaway: citizens have limited ...
Income Tax : Detailed overview of penalties under various sections of the Income Tax Act, covering defaults in tax payment, reporting, document...
Income Tax : An overview of Sections 68-69D of India's Income-tax Act, which empower tax authorities to assess unaccounted income from unexplai...
Corporate Law : Details on Indian government's blocking of YouTube channels, citing IT Rules 2021 and Section 69A of IT Act 2000. Learn about reas...
Income Tax : ITAT Indore held that appellate order violated principles of natural justice after finding that key hearing notices were sent to a...
Income Tax : ITAT Rajkot held that cash deposits made during demonetization were fully supported by audited books of account, cash books, and b...
Income Tax : ITAT Hyderabad held that addition of Rs. 13 lakh under Section 69A through rectification proceedings exceeded the scope of Section...
Income Tax : The Tribunal held that the reassessment notice issued on 26.07.2022 was beyond the permissible timeline under the surviving limita...
Income Tax : Tribunal dismissed a Revenue appeal after finding that additions were made solely on basis of entries in a seized Excel file. It h...
ITAT Indore held that AO made addition towards unexplained deposited without being aware of possession of two PAN by single person-assessee. Accordingly, matter remanded to the file of AO with imposition of cost of Rs. 7,000/-.
The ITAT Ahmedabad has restored a case involving unexplained cash deposits of Rs. 18.32 lakh to the Assessing Officer, citing a failure to examine debit entries and additional evidence, and condoning a 323-day delay in appeal filing.
ITAT Cuttack overturns ₹5.01 lakh addition, ruling business receipts are a substantiated source for cash deposits. Ad-hoc expense disallowance also deleted for AY 2017-18.
ITAT Mumbai held that addition under section 69A towards unexplained cash found during course of search cannot be sustained since reconciliation of cash with concerned sales invoices duly produced. Accordingly, appeal of revenue dismissed to that extent.
The Delhi High Court upholds the ITAT’s decision to delete a Rs. 5.17 crore addition to Anoop Jain’s income, finding no evidence he owned the funds under Section 69A of the Income Tax Act.
The ITAT Lucknow bench deleted an addition made under Section 69A, ruling that a cash deposit from the assessee’s wife’s withdrawals was a sufficiently explained source.
The ITAT ruled that unaccounted receipts from known business debtors can’t be taxed as unexplained money under Section 69A, granting relief to an assessee.
ITAT Mumbai deletes a ₹1.69 crore addition under Section 69A against Parth Ajit Pawar. The ruling emphasizes that a third-party statement without cross-examination and corroborating evidence is not valid for making additions.
ITAT Delhi held that addition under section 69A of the Income Tax Act towards cash deposited during demonetization period deleted to the extent of cash sales which is accepted. Accordingly, appeal partly allowed.
ITAT Delhi rules DVO reference before Sec 148 notice invalid; deletes Rs 2.28 Cr addition in Aerens Group case due to lack of pending assessment.
