Company Law : The article examines the Hamlin Trust ruling, where the NCLAT held that CFO appointments must satisfy Section 203 eligibility requ...
Corporate Law : Explains how recent tribunal decisions shaped the rules for selling corporate debtors as going concerns, highlighting compliance...
Corporate Law : The Tripartite Agreement Trap: When Banks Lose Financial Creditor Status in Real Estate Insolvency This case memo discussed the ru...
Corporate Law : NCLAT holds that time spent in pending Debt Recovery Tribunal proceedings cannot be excluded under Section 14 of the Limitation Ac...
Corporate Law : RTI inquiry into NCLT/NCLAT reveals member vacancies, lack of consolidated case data, and opaque appointments, highlighting need f...
Corporate Law : The Supreme Court upheld joint insolvency proceedings against two interconnected real estate companies due to common management an...
Corporate Law : From 2022-23 to 2024-25, appeals filed at NCLAT rose steadily, with IBC cases forming the majority, reflecting active engagement i...
Corporate Law : Supreme Court ruled that CoC and RP can surrender financially burdensome assets voluntarily, clarifying moratorium under section 1...
Corporate Law : SC clarifies limits of High Court's writ powers in IBC cases and recognises Indian CIRP as foreign main proceeding in cross-border...
Corporate Law : NCLT & NCLAT eligibility criteria, insolvency rules, and case statistics from 2022-2024. Updates on financial irregularities and r...
Corporate Law : NCLAT held that invoice discounting through the TReDS platform does not convert operational debt into financial debt. The appeal w...
Corporate Law : Madras HC held that a pending NCLAT appeal did not prevent PNB from conducting a Swiss Challenge auction after the OTS proposal wa...
Company Law : The NCLAT held that CFO nominees must satisfy the eligibility requirements under Section 203 of the Companies Act. It set aside th...
Income Tax : NCLAT held that a single application covering multiple years and company officers is maintainable in the absence of any statutory ...
Corporate Law : Tribunal held that proviso to Regulation 7A allows insolvency professionals to continue assignments already underway even after th...
Corporate Law : IBBI orders disciplinary action against Mr. S Vasudevan for alleged violations in the insolvency process of Mega Foods Products Ma...
Corporate Law : IBBI suspends IP for Failure to act during CIRP despite NCLAT directive and for Delay in convening Committee of Creditors (CoC) me...
Corporate Law : Read about the IBBI's disciplinary action against Mr. Venkata Sivakumar, an Interim Resolution Professional, for sharing asset mem...
Corporate Law : Govt issued a circular detailing vacancies for Judicial & Technical Members posts in NCLAT with detailed guide to apply for these...
Fema / RBI : It is clarified that cases admitted with National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT)/National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) unde...
NCLAT Delhi held that adjudicating authority, not solely relying on the resolution professional’s report, needs to conduct an independent assessment under section 100 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016.
NCLAT Delhi held that lease hold rights are assets of Corporate Debtor hence termination of the same by GIDC is in violation of section 14 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016. Thus, appeal filed by Resolution Professional deserves to be allowed.
NCLAT Chennai dismisses appeal as infructuous but raises concerns over the process followed by NCLT in passing the original order.
The Adjudicating Authority by the impugned order rejected MA No.03 of 2023. The Adjudicating Authority held that non-compliance by the Appellant of Regulation 21A, sub-regulation (2), the assets of Haldia Unit has become the Liquidation Estate of the CD.
NCLAT Delhi held that as per section 33(2) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, CoC is empowered to take decision to liquidate the Corporate Debtor thus resolution passed with 100% vote share directing for liquidation of Corporate Debtor [Go Airlines] justified.
NCLAT Delhi held that in absence of both disbursements directly to Corporate Debtor and default, attempt to invoke proceedings u/s. 7 of IBC unsustainable. Thus, since CIRP was fraudulent and malicious, dismissal u/s. 65 of IBC upheld.
NCLAT Delhi held that demand notice issued u/s. 95(4) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 [IBC] when sent to last known address as stipulated in Guarantee Deed is valid service of notice under established legal principles. Accordingly, appeals dismissed.
NCLAT rules allottee who cancelled unit by request cannot be financial creditor. Order directs payment of settled bank loan.
NCLAT Delhi held that failure of reconciliation of accounts qualifies as pre-existing dispute. Thus, order admitting application u/s. 9 of Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 ignoring pre-existing dispute is not justified. Hence, order is set aside.
NCLAT Delhi allows the appeal of Essar Oil & Gas, setting aside the NCLT Ahmedabad order admitting Section 9 application filed by Greeka Greens Solution.
