ITAT Judgment contain Income Tax related Judgments from Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Across India which includes ITAT Mumbai, Chennai, Delhi, Kolkutta, Hyderabad etc.
Income Tax : ITAT held section 35D(2)(c) applies only to companies and upheld disallowance of REIT's claim for IPO and listing expense amortisa...
Income Tax : Article examines whether the MLI Principal Purpose Test has domestic effect under Section 90(1) following Nestlé SA and Sky High ...
Corporate Law : The article argues that failure to comply before the AO or CIT(A) can lead to adverse assessments, as higher forums generally cann...
Income Tax : ITAT held that Section 54 exemption must be examined separately for each residential house sold. Aggregating gains from multiple t...
Income Tax : ITAT held that delayed filing of Form 10B cannot defeat Section 11 exemption if the audit report is available before processing un...
Income Tax : ITAT Bangalore restored the appeal after holding that mere upload of an order on the ITBA portal is not valid service under Sectio...
Income Tax : ITAT Bangalore held Section 2(47)(v) inapplicable as the JDA did not satisfy Section 53A conditions, deleting capital gains for AY...
Income Tax : The issue concerns massive backlog in ITAT caused by unfilled positions and delayed appointments. The intervention highlights that...
Income Tax : A representation seeks doubling the SMC threshold due to inflation and higher dispute values. The key takeaway is that increasing ...
Income Tax : The tribunal held that a gift deed alone cannot establish legitimacy under Section 68. It directed fresh scrutiny of the donor’s...
Income Tax : ITAT Bangalore deleted interest capitalisation, holding that investments in subsidiary were made from sufficient interest-free own...
Income Tax : ITAT Mumbai deleted the caveat attached to Section 12AB registration and Section 80G approval, holding that the grant could not be...
Income Tax : ITAT Mumbai allowed deduction under Section 37(1) for payments to insurance aggregators, holding Explanation 1 was not attracted o...
Income Tax : ITAT Panaji deleted ₹8 lakh out of a ₹9 lakh addition after accepting interest-free loans from relatives and ₹2 lakh accumul...
Income Tax : ITAT Chennai deleted the addition on insurance compensation for fire loss and the related penalty after holding the receipt had al...
Income Tax : ITAT Pune allowed rectification under Section 254(2), correcting factual errors and granting Section 54EC deduction of ₹1 crore ...
Income Tax : The ITAT Delhi has revised its hearing notice protocols. Physical notices will now be sent only once, with subsequent dates availa...
Income Tax : ITAT Chandigarh held that ITO Ward-3(1), Chandigarh had no jurisdiction to issue notice to an NRI and hence consequently the asses...
Income Tax : Central Government is pleased to appoint Shri G. S. Pannu, Vice-President of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, as President of th...
Income Tax : Ministry of Finance notified rules for appointment of members in various tribunals on 12.02.2020 in which practice of judicial and...
Janata Urban Co-op. Bank Ltd. Vs ACIT (ITAT Pune) The impugned order was passed in 2017, the appeal was filed in 2021. The assessee has filed return of income which clearly shows that the assessee is supported by professionals having expertise in Income Tax procedures. The delay of 685 days cannot be accepted as the […]
Mumbai ITAT has quashed reopening of assessment under section 147 made by AO only on the basis of information received from report of investigation wing.
ITAT Pune held that payment of Education Cess (including secondary and higher secondary education), is an additional surcharge levied on income-tax and hence it partakes the character of Income-tax, and accordingly is not allowable deduction.
Disallowance under section 36(1)(va) on account to late deposit of employees contribution of provident fund was justified as employees contribution retained its character as income by virtue of section 2(24)(x) unless the conditions spelt by Explanation to section 36(1)(va) were satisfied i.e. depositing such amount received or deducted from the employee on or before the due date.
ITAT Ahmedabad held that AO failed to prove that material seized, during the course of search in case of third party, belong to the assessee. Hence, invocation of proceedings u/s. 153C of the Income tax Act is against the provisions of law
ITAT Delhi held that the limitation period is four years for passing assessment order in case of TDS statement not filed. Limitation period substituted to six years effective only from 01/10/2014.
ITAT Delhi held that Ministry of Home Affairs, vide Notification dated 27.09.2022 clearly demonstrated the Popular Front of India (PFI) and its associates or affiliates or fronts as an unlawful association and hence cancellation of income tax registration u/s 12AA(3) of the Income Tax Act justified.
ITAT Kolkata held that addition of unexplained cash credit u/s 68 of the Income Tax Act unsustainable as identity creditworthiness of the investors and genuineness of the transactions duly proved.
ITAT Ahmedabad held that advertisement expenses incurred at the time of installation of additional machinery in the existing line of business resulted in any enduring benefit is revenue expenditure Further advertisement expenses incurred to create brand image is revenue expenditure.
ITAT Mumbai held that transfer pricing adjustment on account of guarantee commission income is unsustainable in terms of India-Germany DTAA.
