Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Meenakshi Dhanaji Patil Vs ITO (ITAT Pune)
Related Assessment Year : 2011-12
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Meenakshi Dhanaji Patil Vs ITO (ITAT Pune) Assessing Officer can make `other addition’ in the reassessment proceedings, provided, the `foundational addition’ is made. When this proposition is taken to a next level, no different consequences will emerge, if the `foundational addition’ is itself finally deleted in an appeal. In such a scenario, the `other addition’ made by the Assessing Officer would automatically cease to stand in isolation. This view has been affirmed by the Hon’ble jurisdictional High Court in CIT vs. Adhunik Niryat Ispat Ltd. (2011) 63 DTR 212 (Del). FULL TEXT ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

I am a Chartered Accountant turned Lawyer in Practise. My focused area of practise is Income-tax litigation and advisory View Full Profile

My Published Posts

filing of Audit report in form 10B is directory is nature & not mandatory- Delay condoned No addition for Demonitization Cash deposit when books not rejected: ITAT Pune Technical Delay Cannot Justify Refusal of Section 80G Approval: ITAT Orders Fresh Review   Rental Income Not a Bar to 12A Registration When Applied to Charity: ITAT Pune Cash Deposited during Demonitization allowed by Pune ITAT View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
April 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930