ITAT Judgment contain Income Tax related Judgments from Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Across India which includes ITAT Mumbai, Chennai, Delhi, Kolkutta, Hyderabad etc.
Income Tax : ITAT held section 35D(2)(c) applies only to companies and upheld disallowance of REIT's claim for IPO and listing expense amortisa...
Income Tax : Article examines whether the MLI Principal Purpose Test has domestic effect under Section 90(1) following Nestlé SA and Sky High ...
Corporate Law : The article argues that failure to comply before the AO or CIT(A) can lead to adverse assessments, as higher forums generally cann...
Income Tax : ITAT held that Section 54 exemption must be examined separately for each residential house sold. Aggregating gains from multiple t...
Income Tax : ITAT held that delayed filing of Form 10B cannot defeat Section 11 exemption if the audit report is available before processing un...
Income Tax : ITAT Bangalore restored the appeal after holding that mere upload of an order on the ITBA portal is not valid service under Sectio...
Income Tax : ITAT Bangalore held Section 2(47)(v) inapplicable as the JDA did not satisfy Section 53A conditions, deleting capital gains for AY...
Income Tax : The issue concerns massive backlog in ITAT caused by unfilled positions and delayed appointments. The intervention highlights that...
Income Tax : A representation seeks doubling the SMC threshold due to inflation and higher dispute values. The key takeaway is that increasing ...
Income Tax : The tribunal held that a gift deed alone cannot establish legitimacy under Section 68. It directed fresh scrutiny of the donor’s...
Income Tax : ITAT Panaji deleted ₹8 lakh out of a ₹9 lakh addition after accepting interest-free loans from relatives and ₹2 lakh accumul...
Income Tax : ITAT Chennai deleted the addition on insurance compensation for fire loss and the related penalty after holding the receipt had al...
Income Tax : ITAT Mumbai deleted disallowances on bonus provision reversal and brokerage provision, allowed Section 80G deduction, and allowed ...
Income Tax : ITAT Mumbai held that a genuine business expenditure cannot be disallowed merely because it was booked under an incorrect accounti...
Income Tax : ITAT Bangalore quashed reassessment under Sections 148 and 150, holding it was time-barred and unsupported by any finding or direc...
Income Tax : ITAT Pune allowed rectification under Section 254(2), correcting factual errors and granting Section 54EC deduction of ₹1 crore ...
Income Tax : The ITAT Delhi has revised its hearing notice protocols. Physical notices will now be sent only once, with subsequent dates availa...
Income Tax : ITAT Chandigarh held that ITO Ward-3(1), Chandigarh had no jurisdiction to issue notice to an NRI and hence consequently the asses...
Income Tax : Central Government is pleased to appoint Shri G. S. Pannu, Vice-President of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, as President of th...
Income Tax : Ministry of Finance notified rules for appointment of members in various tribunals on 12.02.2020 in which practice of judicial and...
ITAT Kolkata held that invoking revisionary proceedings justified as AO failed to conduct the enquiry about the bogus transactions inspite of the report of the Investigation Wing containing the list of 84 companies found to be penny stock companies available in the Income Tax Portal.
ITAT Pune held that profits and gains arising from transfer of interest in Hydro Projects is income from business and not income under the head ‘short term capital gains’.
ITAT Pune held that information from the office of DIT (Inv.)-II is a tangible information enabling AO to form a belief that income has escaped assessment and hence proceedings of re-assessment justified.
ITAT Bangalore held that penalty under section 271F of the Income Tax Act leviable as assessee being a habitual defaulter filed income tax return for four years filed belatedly
Bablu Kumar Harinarayan Gupta Vs ITO (ITAT Pune) ITAT held that it is not fit case for levy of penalty u/s 271B merely because the appellant was unable to substantiate the submission that the appellant is only commission agent because there is no obligation on the part of the assessee to get the accounts audited […]
ITAT held that provisions of sub-section (4) would be applicable in respect of agreement to sell for transfer of an asset which has been executed on or after 1st April, 2013.
ITAT held that if advances received by the assessee from customers on which TDS Credits has been claimed, has been offered as income of subsequent financial years, then the same needs to be recognized as income as and when such income accrues to the assessee.
In the present case, it has been categorically established that, the amount of bogus purchases ₹64,33,495/- is debited to P&L by fictitious tax invoices
ITAT held that assessee cannot be denied benefit of exemption for which it is entitled merely on the lapse of procedural requirement i.e. delay in filing audit report in prescribed form.
CIT(E) lacked jurisdiction to impose any conditions on his own (other than what is stipulated in law) while granting approval under section 80G of Income Tax Act
