ITAT Judgment contain Income Tax related Judgments from Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Across India which includes ITAT Mumbai, Chennai, Delhi, Kolkutta, Hyderabad etc.
Income Tax : ITAT held section 35D(2)(c) applies only to companies and upheld disallowance of REIT's claim for IPO and listing expense amortisa...
Income Tax : Article examines whether the MLI Principal Purpose Test has domestic effect under Section 90(1) following Nestlé SA and Sky High ...
Corporate Law : The article argues that failure to comply before the AO or CIT(A) can lead to adverse assessments, as higher forums generally cann...
Income Tax : ITAT held that Section 54 exemption must be examined separately for each residential house sold. Aggregating gains from multiple t...
Income Tax : ITAT held that delayed filing of Form 10B cannot defeat Section 11 exemption if the audit report is available before processing un...
Income Tax : ITAT Bangalore restored the appeal after holding that mere upload of an order on the ITBA portal is not valid service under Sectio...
Income Tax : ITAT Bangalore held Section 2(47)(v) inapplicable as the JDA did not satisfy Section 53A conditions, deleting capital gains for AY...
Income Tax : The issue concerns massive backlog in ITAT caused by unfilled positions and delayed appointments. The intervention highlights that...
Income Tax : A representation seeks doubling the SMC threshold due to inflation and higher dispute values. The key takeaway is that increasing ...
Income Tax : The tribunal held that a gift deed alone cannot establish legitimacy under Section 68. It directed fresh scrutiny of the donor’s...
Income Tax : ITAT Panaji deleted ₹8 lakh out of a ₹9 lakh addition after accepting interest-free loans from relatives and ₹2 lakh accumul...
Income Tax : ITAT Chennai deleted the addition on insurance compensation for fire loss and the related penalty after holding the receipt had al...
Income Tax : ITAT Mumbai deleted disallowances on bonus provision reversal and brokerage provision, allowed Section 80G deduction, and allowed ...
Income Tax : ITAT Mumbai held that a genuine business expenditure cannot be disallowed merely because it was booked under an incorrect accounti...
Income Tax : ITAT Bangalore quashed reassessment under Sections 148 and 150, holding it was time-barred and unsupported by any finding or direc...
Income Tax : ITAT Pune allowed rectification under Section 254(2), correcting factual errors and granting Section 54EC deduction of ₹1 crore ...
Income Tax : The ITAT Delhi has revised its hearing notice protocols. Physical notices will now be sent only once, with subsequent dates availa...
Income Tax : ITAT Chandigarh held that ITO Ward-3(1), Chandigarh had no jurisdiction to issue notice to an NRI and hence consequently the asses...
Income Tax : Central Government is pleased to appoint Shri G. S. Pannu, Vice-President of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, as President of th...
Income Tax : Ministry of Finance notified rules for appointment of members in various tribunals on 12.02.2020 in which practice of judicial and...
Held that if such loan or advances given to such shareholder as a consequence of any further consideration, which is beneficial to the company received from such shareholder then in such advance or loan cannot be said to be deemed dividend within the ambit of section 2(22)(e) of the Act.
ITAT Mumbai held that disallowance for deduction under section 80IB and 80IC of the Income Tax Act corresponding to the allocation of R&D expenditure is deleted.
ITAT Mumbai held that stamp duty valuation as on the date of allotment letters, and not the date of execution of agreement to sell, should be considered for the purpose of section 56(2)(x) of the Income Tax Act.
ITAT Delhi held that penalty under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act cannot be imposed on the basis of legal fiction of section 50C of the Income Tax Act.
ITAT Amritsar held that appellant being a government undertaking is required to take necessary permission for filing of an appeal from its head office. Delay in getting the permission resulted into delay in filing of an appeal. Such not intentional or mala fide delay should be condoned.
ITAT Jodhpur held that penalty under section 271(1)(b) of the Income Tax Act not imposable for non-compliance of section 142(1) of the Income Tax Act.
ITAT Chennai held that as the quantum of addition has not attained its finality, the penalty levied under section 270A of the Income Tax Act not imposable.
ITAT Mumbai held that mere presumption that plots are intended for further sale and hence plots were stock-in-trade does not make the claim satisfying as the assessee failed to prove the same by way of evidences.
ITAT Pune held that mere non-furnishing of declaration to the bank in terms of proviso to rule 37BA(2) of the Income Tax Rules, the amount of tax deducted at source on interest on bank deposit cannot be disallowed while clubbing of the income.
ITAT Ahmedabad held that entire receipts on account of on-money-premium charged would not to be treated as the undisclosed income but only net profit rate could be applied on unaccounted sales/receipt for the purpose of making addition.
