ITAT Judgment contain Income Tax related Judgments from Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Across India which includes ITAT Mumbai, Chennai, Delhi, Kolkutta, Hyderabad etc.
Income Tax : Article examines whether the MLI Principal Purpose Test has domestic effect under Section 90(1) following Nestlé SA and Sky High ...
Corporate Law : The article argues that failure to comply before the AO or CIT(A) can lead to adverse assessments, as higher forums generally cann...
Income Tax : ITAT held that Section 54 exemption must be examined separately for each residential house sold. Aggregating gains from multiple t...
Income Tax : ITAT held that delayed filing of Form 10B cannot defeat Section 11 exemption if the audit report is available before processing un...
Income Tax : Smt. Ranjana Kumari/Kalta Vs DCIT/ACIT (Central) (ITAT Chandigarh) The appeals involved three assessees belonging to the Kalta Gro...
Income Tax : ITAT Bangalore held Section 2(47)(v) inapplicable as the JDA did not satisfy Section 53A conditions, deleting capital gains for AY...
Income Tax : The issue concerns massive backlog in ITAT caused by unfilled positions and delayed appointments. The intervention highlights that...
Income Tax : A representation seeks doubling the SMC threshold due to inflation and higher dispute values. The key takeaway is that increasing ...
Income Tax : The tribunal held that a gift deed alone cannot establish legitimacy under Section 68. It directed fresh scrutiny of the donor’s...
Income Tax : Delhi ITAT allows Sanco Holding, a Norwegian company, to compute income from bareboat charter of seismic vessels under Article 21(...
Income Tax : ITAT Delhi deleted Section 68 and bogus purchase additions, holding no incriminating material existed for concluded assessments an...
Income Tax : ITAT Nagpur upheld deletion of capital gains, holding that a development agreement granting only a licence to develop did not amou...
Income Tax : ITAT Delhi quashed the assessment after holding that the Section 143(2) notice was issued by an ITO lacking pecuniary jurisdiction...
Income Tax : ITAT Delhi held ground handling and engineering service receipts taxable in India, rejecting Article 8 India-UK DTAA exemption for...
Income Tax : ITAT Patna allowed deduction for interest on delayed sales tax, service tax and employer's PF, disallowed TDS interest, and remand...
Income Tax : ITAT Pune allowed rectification under Section 254(2), correcting factual errors and granting Section 54EC deduction of ₹1 crore ...
Income Tax : The ITAT Delhi has revised its hearing notice protocols. Physical notices will now be sent only once, with subsequent dates availa...
Income Tax : ITAT Chandigarh held that ITO Ward-3(1), Chandigarh had no jurisdiction to issue notice to an NRI and hence consequently the asses...
Income Tax : Central Government is pleased to appoint Shri G. S. Pannu, Vice-President of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, as President of th...
Income Tax : Ministry of Finance notified rules for appointment of members in various tribunals on 12.02.2020 in which practice of judicial and...
Analysis of ITAT Kolkata’s landmark decision in Bagaria More Co. Ltd. vs ADIT, focusing on the treatment of the cost of amenities provided to tenants under Income from House Property.
A detailed analysis of the ITAT Chennai’s ruling on Trimex Sands Pvt. Vs PCIT. The court allows income tax deductions, recognizing mineral extraction from beach sand as manufacturing u/s 2(29BA) of the Income Tax Act.
Explore the landmark ruling of Vijay Shriram Gundale Vs ACIT by ITAT Pune. Learn how excess stock income is categorized as business income, exempt from Section 69B of the Income Tax Act.
ITAT Mumbai quashes PCIT order against Masani Engineering Co. Pvt Ltd . Explore detailed analysis of why allegations of understated revenue in P&L were baseless.
ITAT Kolkata’s ruling on additional depreciation under Section 32(1)(iia) of Income Tax Act on Captive Power Plant Equipment in DCIT Vs Tirupati Sugars.
Assessee argued that since they were subject to audit under the Maharashtra State Co-Operative Act, their due date under Section 139(1) of the Income Tax Act was extended to October 31, 2018. Thus, they filed their ITR well within the time limit.
In Vinodchandra Dalsukhram Gokhlani Vs ITO, ITAT Ahmedabad ruled on addition for unaccounted sale proceeds based on loose papers and retracted statements
ITAT Chennai in Estate of Late Smt. Jayanthi Krishnamurthy Vs ACIT held that no addition could be made under section 153A in absence of incriminating evidence resulting from a search, especially if assessment is unabated.
ITAT Mumbai held that change of opinion is not permissible under the garb of reopening of assessment under section 147/148 of the Income Tax Act.
ITAT Bangalore held that payments received towards interconnectivity utility charges from Indian customers / end users cannot be considered as Royalty to be brought to tax in India under section 9(1)(vi) of the Income Tax Act and also as per DTAA.
