ITAT Judgment contain Income Tax related Judgments from Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Across India which includes ITAT Mumbai, Chennai, Delhi, Kolkutta, Hyderabad etc.
Income Tax : The Tribunal held that cash deposits during demonetisation cannot be treated as unexplained when backed by audited books, invoices...
Income Tax : The Tribunal ruled that non-specification of the precise statutory charge under sections 270A(2) and 270A(9) violated principles o...
Income Tax : The Delhi ITAT held that institutions engaged in preservation of environment fall under a specific charitable limb under Section 2...
Income Tax : The Tribunal held that CIT(A) cannot enhance income under Section 251 on matters not considered by the Assessing Officer during as...
Income Tax : ITAT Bangalore restored the Section 54F claim after noting that medical issues and portal difficulties prevented timely filing of ...
Income Tax : The issue concerns massive backlog in ITAT caused by unfilled positions and delayed appointments. The intervention highlights that...
Income Tax : A representation seeks doubling the SMC threshold due to inflation and higher dispute values. The key takeaway is that increasing ...
Income Tax : The tribunal held that a gift deed alone cannot establish legitimacy under Section 68. It directed fresh scrutiny of the donor’s...
Income Tax : Delhi ITAT allows Sanco Holding, a Norwegian company, to compute income from bareboat charter of seismic vessels under Article 21(...
Income Tax : Learn about hybrid hearing guidelines of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) Indore Bench, effective from October 9, 2023, offeri...
Income Tax : The ITAT Bangalore held that gains arising from buyback of shares are taxable under Section 46A because the conditions prescribed ...
Income Tax : ITAT Mumbai held that incomplete WhatsApp chats without proof of completed transactions cannot justify additions under Section 69A...
Income Tax : ITAT Delhi held that penalty under Section 271AAC cannot survive once the underlying Section 153C assessment is quashed. The Tribu...
Income Tax : ITAT Delhi held that electronic evidence seized during search proceedings cannot be relied upon without mandatory certification un...
Income Tax : ITAT Delhi held that where sales are accepted and purchases are supported by invoices and banking transactions, only the profit el...
Income Tax : The ITAT Delhi has revised its hearing notice protocols. Physical notices will now be sent only once, with subsequent dates availa...
Income Tax : ITAT Chandigarh held that ITO Ward-3(1), Chandigarh had no jurisdiction to issue notice to an NRI and hence consequently the asses...
Income Tax : Central Government is pleased to appoint Shri G. S. Pannu, Vice-President of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, as President of th...
Income Tax : Ministry of Finance notified rules for appointment of members in various tribunals on 12.02.2020 in which practice of judicial and...
Income Tax : Bhagyalaxmi Conclave Pvt. Ltd. Vs DCIT (ITAT Kolkata) In the remand report, the AO clearly stated that notice u/s 143(2) of the Ac...
In a recent case, ITAT Guwahati ruled on ‘Income other than business/profession mismatch,’ setting aside the assessment order. Detailed analysis of the decision.
Explore the JCIT vs S.V. Balasubramani HUF case at ITAT Chennai. Learn why bonus payment disallowance under section 40A(3) of the Income Tax Act was challenged and the outcome of the appeal.
ITAT Chandigarh held that initiation of reassessment proceeding merely on the fact that AO has not carried out independent enquiries of confirmations from the creditors, without pointing out any deficiency or inaccuracy, cannot be a base to hold that order was erroneous in so far as prejudicial to the interest of revenue. Accordingly, reassessment unsustainable.
Explore the Bengal Tiger Line vs. DCIT case: ITAT Chennai rules in favor of the assessee, allowing benefits under India-Singapore DTAA for Vessel Handling Charges.
ITAT Delhi dismisses appeal, upholding taxability of interest received under Section 28 of Land Acquisition Act as income from other sources. Details of the case here.
In a recent appeal, Halo Technologies challenges the CIT(A)’s order on late fees under Section 234E of the Income Tax Act. ITAT Mumbai directs re-adjudication, citing lack of opportunity for the Assessee to explain the delay. Full text of the ITAT order dated 20.10.2023.
Explore ITAT Delhi’s decision in DCIT Vs Bharti Realty Holdings Ltd, allowing previously disallowed losses due to incorrect interpretation of Section 43(6) provisions.
Explore the ITAT Mumbai’s reversal of CIT(A)’s order in Laxman Mahadev Patil Vs ITO case for not passing a merit-based decision. Read the full text and analysis.
Read the detailed analysis of the ITAT Mumbai ruling in Standard Fiscal Markets Pvt. Ltd. vs DCIT case. No section 68 addition for conduit entity. Insights on tax implications.
ITAT Mumbai held that reference to TPO in respect of Specified Domestic Transaction (SDT) u/s. 92BA(i) has been omitted from the statue by the Finance Act, 2017 w.e.f. 01/04/2017. Hence, entire reference and transfer pricing adjustment is invalid.
