ITAT Judgment contain Income Tax related Judgments from Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Across India which includes ITAT Mumbai, Chennai, Delhi, Kolkutta, Hyderabad etc.
Income Tax : Article examines whether the MLI Principal Purpose Test has domestic effect under Section 90(1) following Nestlé SA and Sky High ...
Corporate Law : The article argues that failure to comply before the AO or CIT(A) can lead to adverse assessments, as higher forums generally cann...
Income Tax : ITAT held that Section 54 exemption must be examined separately for each residential house sold. Aggregating gains from multiple t...
Income Tax : ITAT held that delayed filing of Form 10B cannot defeat Section 11 exemption if the audit report is available before processing un...
Income Tax : Smt. Ranjana Kumari/Kalta Vs DCIT/ACIT (Central) (ITAT Chandigarh) The appeals involved three assessees belonging to the Kalta Gro...
Income Tax : ITAT Bangalore held Section 2(47)(v) inapplicable as the JDA did not satisfy Section 53A conditions, deleting capital gains for AY...
Income Tax : The issue concerns massive backlog in ITAT caused by unfilled positions and delayed appointments. The intervention highlights that...
Income Tax : A representation seeks doubling the SMC threshold due to inflation and higher dispute values. The key takeaway is that increasing ...
Income Tax : The tribunal held that a gift deed alone cannot establish legitimacy under Section 68. It directed fresh scrutiny of the donor’s...
Income Tax : Delhi ITAT allows Sanco Holding, a Norwegian company, to compute income from bareboat charter of seismic vessels under Article 21(...
Income Tax : ITAT Chennai deleted an addition of ₹17.10 lakh after holding that it was based solely on third-party information and estimated ...
Income Tax : ITAT Mumbai upheld taxation of only 25% profit on alleged on-money receipts, rejected Section 69C addition of entire amount and su...
Income Tax : Chennai ITAT restored Section 12AA registration, holding uncorroborated capitation fee allegations alone cannot justify cancellati...
Income Tax : Chennai ITAT held that seized Tally data alone cannot justify bogus purchase additions without corroborative evidence, while susta...
Income Tax : ITAT Surat dismissed Revenue’s appeal, upholding deletion of Section 10AA addition and holding no other issue could be added in ...
Income Tax : The ITAT Delhi has revised its hearing notice protocols. Physical notices will now be sent only once, with subsequent dates availa...
Income Tax : ITAT Chandigarh held that ITO Ward-3(1), Chandigarh had no jurisdiction to issue notice to an NRI and hence consequently the asses...
Income Tax : Central Government is pleased to appoint Shri G. S. Pannu, Vice-President of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, as President of th...
Income Tax : Ministry of Finance notified rules for appointment of members in various tribunals on 12.02.2020 in which practice of judicial and...
Income Tax : Bhagyalaxmi Conclave Pvt. Ltd. Vs DCIT (ITAT Kolkata) In the remand report, the AO clearly stated that notice u/s 143(2) of the Ac...
ITAT Delhi held that assessments for defective returns must be made under Section 144, invalidating prior orders issued under Section 143(3).
ITAT Mumbai held that since deed of conveyance executed on 31.03.2017, provisions of section 56(2)(x) of Income Tax Act are not applicable. Section 56(2)(x) is inserted by Finance Act, 2017 and effective only from 01.04.2017.
ITAT Mumbai held that notice issued under section 148 of the Income Tax Act and procedure adopted being per se illegal hence the notices deserves to be set aside/ quashed.
ITAT Mumbai rules on the appeal of ACIT against Sangeeta Ganpat Sawant regarding undisclosed income and indexed cost of improvement.
The Tribunal held that the assessee’s claim under Section 11 required fresh examination since delay in filing Form 10B had already been condoned by the competent authority after assessment proceedings.
ITAT Delhi remands the case of Sanjeev Mittal Vs ACIT for fresh adjudication due to lack of adequate opportunity for the appellant during earlier proceedings.
In Buniyad Chemicals Ltd. Vs ACIT, ITAT Mumbai restricts the addition of commission on accommodation entries to 0.15% of deposits, addressing assessment disputes.
ITAT Mumbai rules on appeals by Atul Hirji Maru regarding interest disallowance and Keyman insurance taxation for AY 2018-19 and 2020-21.
ITAT Mumbai quashes income addition on trust for late Form 10B filing, citing CBDT’s extended deadline. Case returned to CIT(A) for reassessment.
ITAT Lucknow dismissed Revenue’s appeal challenging CIT(A)’s exemption order under Section 26AAB as the AO had already accepted the claim.
