Company Law : The scheme provides a last opportunity for defaulting companies to file pending returns and financial statements with reduced pena...
Company Law : This guide explains the mandatory conditions, documentation, and procedural steps for converting a partnership into a company. It ...
Company Law : The case examined whether extending redemption timelines amounts to reissuance. The Tribunal held that extensions within statutory...
Company Law : MCA has confirmed that extension of annual filing timelines till 31st December 2025 does not extend statutory deadline for holding...
Company Law : A guide to issuing bonus shares for private companies under the Companies Act, 2013, covering legal frameworks, procedural steps, ...
Company Law : The initiative addresses inefficiencies in the current filing system and proposes consolidation and automation. It highlights a sh...
Company Law : NFRA found major deficiencies in audit documentation and archival practices. The report highlights the need for stronger controls ...
Company Law : The inspection report highlights deficiencies in audit documentation, independence monitoring and compliance with auditing standar...
Company Law : The regulator found that the audit firm lacked an effective monitoring mechanism to ensure firmwide independence policies were pro...
Company Law : NFRAs inspection found gaps in audit documentation, revenue testing, and risk assessment practices, stressing the need for stronge...
Company Law : Penalty imposed on Sh. Laxit Awla under Section 165 of Companies Act, 2013, for exceeding directorship limits. Details on violatio...
Corporate Law : That the period of lockdown ordered by the Central Government and the State Governments including the period as may be extended ei...
Company Law : ROC Mumbai imposed penalty for possessing duplicate Director Identification Numbers in violation of Section 155. The ruling highli...
Company Law : ROC Delhi held that failure to regularize an Additional Director at the next AGM violated Section 161(1) of the Companies Act. Sin...
Company Law : The ROC found that the company failed to timely record cessation of an Additional Director whose office had automatically vacated ...
Company Law : ROC Mumbai held that even clerical mistakes in DIR-12 can attract penalty under Section 450 when incorrect information is certifie...
Company Law : The ROC imposed penalties after a company extended its rights issue offer period following requests from promoter shareholders. Th...
directed to refer to your letter no. PD/69/90 dated 19.2.90 on the subject mentioned above and to say that the cost auditor shall be deemed to have concluded his appointment as soon as he renders a report to the Central Government in accordance with the Cost Audit Report Rules. The specified number of companies for the purpose of section 23 3B (2) of the Act
directed to refer to your letter no. CLC/79/89 dated 8th January, 1990 on the subject mentioned above and to say that while giving a certificate in terms of provision to sub-section 224 of the Companies Act, 1956, the auditor or auditors will not take into account the actual appointments as auditors in the companies but also their proposed appointment in companies for which they have given their consent.
After a careful examination of the statement made by the cost auditors, the Department is of the view that it would be more appropriate if while mentioning the figures for previous year, the Cost Auditor certifies the position by means of note that figures so stated are on the basis of information furnished by the management, for which he has obtained a certificate from them.
Under the provision of S. 233B of the Act and the Cost Audit Report Rules made thereunder, the Cost Auditor after the submission of the Cost Audit Report has to furnish replies to all the supplementaries, queries from the Department of Company affairs arising through a review of the Cost Audit Report. A question has arisen as to when the term of a Cost Auditor in respect of company shall be deemed to have concluded. It is clarified that for the purpose of furnishing the certificate under sub-section
Authentication of Cost Audit Report in cases where a firm of Cost Auditors is approved under U/s 233B (2) of the Companies Act, 1956 for conducting Cost Audit.
All the partners of the firm are practicing cost accountants within the meaning of Section 6 and 7 of the Cost and Works Accountants Act, 1959,
The attention of the Institute is drawn to the provisions of section 233B of the Companies Act, 1956, and the Cost Audit (Report) Rules, 1968, as amended from time to time. The duties of the cost accountants appointed to conduct an audit of cost accounts of the company flow directly from the above provisions and as such they should in strict compliance
Similarly, a question has now been raised whether a Cost Auditor of a Company can also be its internal auditor which has been carefully examined in this Department. Since the Cost Auditor is required to comment on the scope and performance of internal audit as per the provisions of the Cost Audit (Report) Rules, 1968, it would tend to mitigate against proper and dispassionate discharge
In exercise of the powers conferred by rule I91-T3 of tho Ceram! Excises Rolm 1944, the Central Government hereby makes the following further amend‑ment in the notification of the Government of India is the Ministry of Finance.
Understand the Companies (Acceptance of Deposits) Rules, 1975, governing deposits. Learn about regulations, compliance, and key provisions for companies
