Corporate Law : NCLAT held that the CoC may decide to liquidate a corporate debtor under Section 33(2) before inviting resolution plans, with limi...
Corporate Law : This article explains why the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code places commercial decision-making in the hands of the Committee of Cr...
Corporate Law : The article explains how the NCLAT interpreted Section 66(1) to extend liability beyond company insiders to third parties who know...
Corporate Law : The Supreme Court held that individuals investing for financial returns rather than home ownership cannot invoke Section 7 of the ...
Corporate Law : The High Court held that a company cannot shift its registered office after approval of a resolution plan when appeals against the...
Corporate Law : IBBI has proposed amendments to CIRP, Liquidation, and Personal Guarantor Regulations to improve valuation, clarify RP duties, sim...
Corporate Law : The proposed amendments require comprehensive project-wise disclosures, technical assessments, and mandatory information in resolu...
Corporate Law : The IBBI has announced contractual vacancies for Research Associates and Consultants in law and business management disciplines. T...
Corporate Law : 2026 Guidelines streamline selection of Insolvency Professionals for IRP, RP, Liquidator, and Bankruptcy Trustee roles, ensuring t...
Corporate Law : The amendments replace the consultation committee with CoC oversight, giving creditors greater control over liquidation decisions....
Corporate Law : Bombay HC held that Section 14 IBC moratorium does not prevent deemed conveyance under Section 11 MOFA and restored the society's ...
Company Law : Kerala HC held Rule 55 empowers NCLT to accept additional pleadings, setting aside refusal to entertain further objections in a Se...
Corporate Law : NCLAT held that invoice discounting through the TReDS platform does not convert operational debt into financial debt. The appeal w...
Corporate Law : Supreme Court held that a Section 7 IBC application can proceed despite pending winding-up proceedings where no irreversible stage...
Corporate Law : NCLT admitted the Section 9 petition after holding that campaign-related emails did not constitute a genuine pre-existing dispute....
Corporate Law : The IBBI First Appellate Authority held that although the CPIO failed to respond within the statutory 30-day period under the RTI ...
Corporate Law : IBBI cancelled an IP’s registration over systemic CIRP misuse, flawed valuations, non-disclosures, compliance failures and lack ...
Corporate Law : IBBI has released the Phase 10 syllabus for the Limited Insolvency Examination, effective from October 1, 2026, to reflect evolvin...
Corporate Law : The First Appellate Authority directed the CPIO to dispose of the RTI application after finding it was not decided within the 30-d...
Corporate Law : The Disciplinary Committee found that the Resolution Professional delayed admission of a financial creditor's claim and failed to ...
Central Government hereby notifies a debt raised from the Special Window for Affordable and Middle-Income Housing Investment Fund I, for the purposes of clause (15) of section 5 of Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016.
Feature for modification of CIRP Forms (including IP-1 Form) submitted by an Insolvency Professional (IP) in compliance of regulation 40B of the IBBI (Insolvency Resolution Process for Corporate Persons) Regulations, 2016.
In this article we would be discussing the third moot question i.e. is it mandatory to issue notice for dispute in reply to demand notice for raising dispute under IBC
NCLAT in the recent judgment Bimalkumar Manubhai Savalia Vs. Bank of India held that part payment by guarantor will not extend limitation period of 3 Years under IBC
The application for registration as valuer of the applicant was received by the Authority only on 19th March 2019. There can be no doubt that the applicant must satisfy the eligibility conditions in accordance with the relevant laws prevalent at the time of grant of registration. When the application of the applicant was received by […]
In this matter, the DC observes that Mr. Arun Kumar Gupta displayed a casual approach during the conduct of CIRP. When a CD is admitted into CIRP, the Code shifts the control of a CD to creditors represented by a CoC for resolving its insolvency. The CoC holds the key to the fate of the […]
(1) This Act may be called the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (Amendment) Act, 2020. (2) It shall be deemed to have come in force on the 28th day of December, 2019.
Recently, a three judge bench of NCLAT in V. Padmakumar vs. Stressed Assets Stabilisation Fund (SAFS) & Anr. considered the issue that ‘whether admission of debt in balance sheet would amount to acknowledgement of debt which would further amount to extension of period of limitation as per Section 18 of the Limitation Act, 1963 (Limitation Act)’.
As per Operational Creditor, Flipkart took delivery first few batches of LED TVs and later on refused to take delivery on the ground of lack of warehouse space. In good gesture Operational Creditor warehoused the LED TVs for a temporary period. For said period Operational Creditor had paid excess custom duties. Flipkart had failed to collect more than 70% of the stock as ordered by them till March, 2018.
6th Report of Standing Committee on Finance on the Insolvency and Bankruptcy (Second Amendment) Bill, 2019 STANDING COMMITTEE ON FINANCE (2019-2020) SEVENTEENTH LOK SABHA THE INSOLVENCY AND BANKRUPTCY (SECOND AMENDMENT) BILL, 2019 (MINISTRY OF CORPORATE AFFAIRS) SIXTH REPORT LOK SABHA SECRETARIAT NEW DELHI March, 2020/Phalguna, 1941 (Saka) SIXTH REPORT STANDING COMMITTEE ON FINANCE (2019-2020) (SEVENTEENTH […]
