Corporate Law : NCLAT held that the CoC may decide to liquidate a corporate debtor under Section 33(2) before inviting resolution plans, with limi...
Corporate Law : This article explains why the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code places commercial decision-making in the hands of the Committee of Cr...
Corporate Law : The article explains how the NCLAT interpreted Section 66(1) to extend liability beyond company insiders to third parties who know...
Corporate Law : The Supreme Court held that individuals investing for financial returns rather than home ownership cannot invoke Section 7 of the ...
Corporate Law : The High Court held that a company cannot shift its registered office after approval of a resolution plan when appeals against the...
Corporate Law : IBBI has proposed amendments to CIRP, Liquidation, and Personal Guarantor Regulations to improve valuation, clarify RP duties, sim...
Corporate Law : The proposed amendments require comprehensive project-wise disclosures, technical assessments, and mandatory information in resolu...
Corporate Law : The IBBI has announced contractual vacancies for Research Associates and Consultants in law and business management disciplines. T...
Corporate Law : 2026 Guidelines streamline selection of Insolvency Professionals for IRP, RP, Liquidator, and Bankruptcy Trustee roles, ensuring t...
Corporate Law : The amendments replace the consultation committee with CoC oversight, giving creditors greater control over liquidation decisions....
Corporate Law : Bombay HC held that Section 14 IBC moratorium does not prevent deemed conveyance under Section 11 MOFA and restored the society's ...
Company Law : Kerala HC held Rule 55 empowers NCLT to accept additional pleadings, setting aside refusal to entertain further objections in a Se...
Corporate Law : NCLAT held that invoice discounting through the TReDS platform does not convert operational debt into financial debt. The appeal w...
Corporate Law : Supreme Court held that a Section 7 IBC application can proceed despite pending winding-up proceedings where no irreversible stage...
Corporate Law : NCLT admitted the Section 9 petition after holding that campaign-related emails did not constitute a genuine pre-existing dispute....
Corporate Law : The IBBI First Appellate Authority held that although the CPIO failed to respond within the statutory 30-day period under the RTI ...
Corporate Law : IBBI cancelled an IP’s registration over systemic CIRP misuse, flawed valuations, non-disclosures, compliance failures and lack ...
Corporate Law : IBBI has released the Phase 10 syllabus for the Limited Insolvency Examination, effective from October 1, 2026, to reflect evolvin...
Corporate Law : The First Appellate Authority directed the CPIO to dispose of the RTI application after finding it was not decided within the 30-d...
Corporate Law : The Disciplinary Committee found that the Resolution Professional delayed admission of a financial creditor's claim and failed to ...
IBBI Discussion Paper on Engagement of ‘professionals’ in a Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) discusses the issue of engagement of ‘professionals’ by an insolvency professional (IP) in a corporate insolvency resolution process (CIRP) and solicits comments on the same.
In the matter of Mr. Venkata Sivakumar, Insolvency Professional (IP) under Regulation 11 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India (Insolvency Professional) Regulations, 2016
In the matter of Ms. Sonu Jain, Insolvency Professional (IP) under Section 220 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (Code) read with Regulation 11 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India (Insolvency Professional) Regulations, 2016 and Regulation 13 of the IBBI (Inspection and Investigation) Regulations, 2017.
In the matter of Mr. Manoj Kumar Jain, Insolvency Professional (IP) under Regulation 11 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India (Insolvency Professional) Regulations, 2016 In the present matter, Mr. Jain has given consent for the CIRP of CD on 22nd July, 2019 i.e. prior to the notification relating to AFA. He was appointed […]
In four years since the enactment of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (Code), the entire ecosystem comprising the Adjudicating Authority (AA), the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India (IBBI), Insolvency Professional Agencies, Insolvency Professionals, Information Utilities, Registered Valuers Organisations and Registered Valuers has been in place.
The DC finds that an order has been passed against Mr. Manudhane on 1st December, 2020 by the Disciplinary Committee of IPA for accepting assignment as Resolution Professional after 31st December, 2019 without holding a valid AFA in the CIRP of the CD and it has been decided that Mr. Manudhane is guilty of Professional […]
In the present matter, Mr. Samson gave written consent to act as an IRP in the CIRP of the CD on 4th April, 2019 and application under section 7 of the Code was filed before the AA on 11th April 2019. He was appointed as IRP by the AA vide order dated 16th July, 2020 […]
In the present matter, Mr. Guddeti was appointed as IRP by National Company Law Tribunal, Delhi Bench, Court – IV (AA) vide order dated 4th February 2020 initiating CIRP of CD on application under section 7 of the Code by M/s Amritvani Exim Private Limited claiming to be financial creditor and public announcement was made […]
In the present matter it is observed that, Mr. Gulati had provided his consent to accept the assignment in Form-2 on 05.02.2019, prior to the amendment made to IP Regulations, vide notification dated 23.07.2019, for acceptance of assignment in matter CIRP of Ardee City Estate Management Private Limited before 31.12.2019 and the date of commencement […]
In the present matter it is observed that, Mr. Deora had provided his consent to accept the assignment in Form-2 on 29.07.2019 in the CIRP of SMS Paryavaran Limited before 31.12.2019 and the date of commencement of the CIRP is 03.01.2020. However, it is also observed that Mr. Deora was appointed as a Resolution Professional […]
