Corporate Law : NCLAT held that the CoC may decide to liquidate a corporate debtor under Section 33(2) before inviting resolution plans, with limi...
Corporate Law : This article explains why the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code places commercial decision-making in the hands of the Committee of Cr...
Corporate Law : The article explains how the NCLAT interpreted Section 66(1) to extend liability beyond company insiders to third parties who know...
Corporate Law : The Supreme Court held that individuals investing for financial returns rather than home ownership cannot invoke Section 7 of the ...
Corporate Law : The High Court held that a company cannot shift its registered office after approval of a resolution plan when appeals against the...
Corporate Law : IBBI has proposed amendments to CIRP, Liquidation, and Personal Guarantor Regulations to improve valuation, clarify RP duties, sim...
Corporate Law : The proposed amendments require comprehensive project-wise disclosures, technical assessments, and mandatory information in resolu...
Corporate Law : The IBBI has announced contractual vacancies for Research Associates and Consultants in law and business management disciplines. T...
Corporate Law : 2026 Guidelines streamline selection of Insolvency Professionals for IRP, RP, Liquidator, and Bankruptcy Trustee roles, ensuring t...
Corporate Law : The amendments replace the consultation committee with CoC oversight, giving creditors greater control over liquidation decisions....
Corporate Law : Bombay HC held that Section 14 IBC moratorium does not prevent deemed conveyance under Section 11 MOFA and restored the society's ...
Company Law : Kerala HC held Rule 55 empowers NCLT to accept additional pleadings, setting aside refusal to entertain further objections in a Se...
Corporate Law : NCLAT held that invoice discounting through the TReDS platform does not convert operational debt into financial debt. The appeal w...
Corporate Law : Supreme Court held that a Section 7 IBC application can proceed despite pending winding-up proceedings where no irreversible stage...
Corporate Law : NCLT admitted the Section 9 petition after holding that campaign-related emails did not constitute a genuine pre-existing dispute....
Corporate Law : The IBBI First Appellate Authority held that although the CPIO failed to respond within the statutory 30-day period under the RTI ...
Corporate Law : IBBI cancelled an IP’s registration over systemic CIRP misuse, flawed valuations, non-disclosures, compliance failures and lack ...
Corporate Law : IBBI has released the Phase 10 syllabus for the Limited Insolvency Examination, effective from October 1, 2026, to reflect evolvin...
Corporate Law : The First Appellate Authority directed the CPIO to dispose of the RTI application after finding it was not decided within the 30-d...
Corporate Law : The Disciplinary Committee found that the Resolution Professional delayed admission of a financial creditor's claim and failed to ...
Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India (IBBI) invites comments from public on the Regulations notified under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (IBC, 2016).
Stay updated on the latest case law related to IBC from January to March 2022. Get insights on court decisions and their implications.
Once the Plan is approved by the Adjudicating Authority under Sub- Section (1) of Section 31 it shall be binding on the Creditors including the Operational Creditors i.e. the Appellants herein.
Jagbasera Infratech Private Ltd. Vs Rawal Variety Construction Ltd. (NCLAT Delhi) Clause 15 of the Memorandum of Understanding specifies that ‘promoter’ shall be entitled to raise loans in its own name from banks/financial institutions for the project. There shall be no liability on the Developer for repayment of the loans or interest.” A careful perusal […]
Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India (Liquidation Process) (Amendment) Regulations, 2022 – It is hereby clarified that the requirements of this regulation shall apply to the liquidation processes commencing on or after the date of the commencement of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India (Liquidation Process) (Amendment) Regulations, 2019.
Uncover instances of the misuse of Section 10 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) by Corporate Debtors with the intention to defraud stakeholders. Explore legal considerations, penalties under Sections 65 and 66, and NCLT’s discretion in such cases. Stay informed on protecting creditor rights.
SC held that It is duty of insurance company to communicate details of terms and conditions of insurance policy to the beneficiaries of insurance.
Ultratech Nathdwara Cement Limited Vs Assistant Commissioner (Rajasthan High Court) This bunch of Sales Tax Revisions involves identical questions of facts and law and hence, the same is being decided together by a common order. These revisions have been preferred by the petitioner M/s. UltraTech Nathdwara Cement Limited for assailing the order dated 28.12.2020 passed […]
Claim of Resolution Professional that he will invite Expression of Interest project wise is not feasible as same is against provisions of IBC 2016.
Is the Limited Insolvency Examination mandated under any law, for what purpose? The Limited Insolvency Examination (examination) is mandated under regulation 5 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India (Insolvency Professionals) Regulations, 2016 made under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016. It is one of the mandatory conditions for registration as an insolvency professional.
