Corporate Law : NCLAT held that the CoC may decide to liquidate a corporate debtor under Section 33(2) before inviting resolution plans, with limi...
Corporate Law : This article explains why the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code places commercial decision-making in the hands of the Committee of Cr...
Corporate Law : The article explains how the NCLAT interpreted Section 66(1) to extend liability beyond company insiders to third parties who know...
Corporate Law : The Supreme Court held that individuals investing for financial returns rather than home ownership cannot invoke Section 7 of the ...
Corporate Law : The High Court held that a company cannot shift its registered office after approval of a resolution plan when appeals against the...
Corporate Law : IBBI has proposed amendments to CIRP, Liquidation, and Personal Guarantor Regulations to improve valuation, clarify RP duties, sim...
Corporate Law : The proposed amendments require comprehensive project-wise disclosures, technical assessments, and mandatory information in resolu...
Corporate Law : The IBBI has announced contractual vacancies for Research Associates and Consultants in law and business management disciplines. T...
Corporate Law : 2026 Guidelines streamline selection of Insolvency Professionals for IRP, RP, Liquidator, and Bankruptcy Trustee roles, ensuring t...
Corporate Law : The amendments replace the consultation committee with CoC oversight, giving creditors greater control over liquidation decisions....
Corporate Law : Bombay HC held that Section 14 IBC moratorium does not prevent deemed conveyance under Section 11 MOFA and restored the society's ...
Company Law : Kerala HC held Rule 55 empowers NCLT to accept additional pleadings, setting aside refusal to entertain further objections in a Se...
Corporate Law : NCLAT held that invoice discounting through the TReDS platform does not convert operational debt into financial debt. The appeal w...
Corporate Law : Supreme Court held that a Section 7 IBC application can proceed despite pending winding-up proceedings where no irreversible stage...
Corporate Law : NCLT admitted the Section 9 petition after holding that campaign-related emails did not constitute a genuine pre-existing dispute....
Corporate Law : The IBBI First Appellate Authority held that although the CPIO failed to respond within the statutory 30-day period under the RTI ...
Corporate Law : IBBI cancelled an IP’s registration over systemic CIRP misuse, flawed valuations, non-disclosures, compliance failures and lack ...
Corporate Law : IBBI has released the Phase 10 syllabus for the Limited Insolvency Examination, effective from October 1, 2026, to reflect evolvin...
Corporate Law : The First Appellate Authority directed the CPIO to dispose of the RTI application after finding it was not decided within the 30-d...
Corporate Law : The Disciplinary Committee found that the Resolution Professional delayed admission of a financial creditor's claim and failed to ...
DC notes that Mr. Kari should have been more careful, diligent, and vigilant in conducting the liquidation process and should have been cautious and prompt in discharging his duties as the Liquidator of the CD. While putting the property to auction, he should have seen whether after successful auction property can be transferred to the […]
Omega Laser Products B.V. Vs Anil Agrawal (NCLAT Delhi) It is seen from the record that the remuneration of the MD is a ‘disputed question of fact’. It is not within our domain under IBC to ‘decide the issue of the fixation of the salary of the MD’, but to ascertain if there is any […]
It was observed that certain circulars are no longer required on account of being already provided in IBBI (Insolvency Resolution Process for Corporate Persons) Regulations, 2016 or IBBI (Insolvency Professionals) Regulations, 2016 as the case may be.
A timeline Of 90 days from the insolvency commencement date is available for filing of claims. However, it has been observed that there is an inordinate delay in filing of claims by Customs and GST authorities. T
Understanding the difference between financial and operational creditors under IBC laws: Supreme Court ruling explained.
New Delhi Municipal Council Vs Minosha India Limited (Supreme Court) Facts- The foremost question which falls for determination is that whether Section 60(6) of the IBC gives rise to a new lease of life to a proceeding at the instance of the corporate debtor on the basis of a moratorium which is put in place […]
The Hon’ble Supreme Court considered whether NOIDA, the Appellant (i.e. Lessor) who has acquired land for the purposes of setting a residential township is a Financial Creditor (FC) of the Corporate Debtor (CD) under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (Code).
Section 5(8)(d) includes only a finance or a capital lease, which is deemed, as such, under the Indian Accounting Standards. Section 5(8)(f) is a residuary and catch all provision. A lease, which is not a finance or a capital lease under Section 5(8)(d), may create a financial debt within the meaning of Section 5(8)(f), if, on its terms, the Court concludes that it is a transaction, under which, any amount is raised, having the commercial effect of the borrowing.
The Resolution Professional has not filed any application for the preferential transaction as required under Section 43(1) of the Code. Hence, apparently while going through the petition and hearing of Ld. Counsels for both the parties, it is very much clear that the Adjudicating Authority on its own has recorded it a related party which is beyond the provisions contend in the Code either explicitly or implicitly.
Section 28(1)(a) of the Code states that an IP shall take prior approval of the CoC before raising any interim finance in excess of the amount which has been decided by the CoC. This means that all the CoC members shall have final call as to what amount, whether initial or additional, may be raised […]
