Corporate Law : NCLAT held that the CoC may decide to liquidate a corporate debtor under Section 33(2) before inviting resolution plans, with limi...
Corporate Law : This article explains why the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code places commercial decision-making in the hands of the Committee of Cr...
Corporate Law : The article explains how the NCLAT interpreted Section 66(1) to extend liability beyond company insiders to third parties who know...
Corporate Law : The Supreme Court held that individuals investing for financial returns rather than home ownership cannot invoke Section 7 of the ...
Corporate Law : The High Court held that a company cannot shift its registered office after approval of a resolution plan when appeals against the...
Corporate Law : IBBI has proposed amendments to CIRP, Liquidation, and Personal Guarantor Regulations to improve valuation, clarify RP duties, sim...
Corporate Law : The proposed amendments require comprehensive project-wise disclosures, technical assessments, and mandatory information in resolu...
Corporate Law : The IBBI has announced contractual vacancies for Research Associates and Consultants in law and business management disciplines. T...
Corporate Law : 2026 Guidelines streamline selection of Insolvency Professionals for IRP, RP, Liquidator, and Bankruptcy Trustee roles, ensuring t...
Corporate Law : The amendments replace the consultation committee with CoC oversight, giving creditors greater control over liquidation decisions....
Corporate Law : Bombay HC held that Section 14 IBC moratorium does not prevent deemed conveyance under Section 11 MOFA and restored the society's ...
Company Law : Kerala HC held Rule 55 empowers NCLT to accept additional pleadings, setting aside refusal to entertain further objections in a Se...
Corporate Law : NCLAT held that invoice discounting through the TReDS platform does not convert operational debt into financial debt. The appeal w...
Corporate Law : Supreme Court held that a Section 7 IBC application can proceed despite pending winding-up proceedings where no irreversible stage...
Corporate Law : NCLT admitted the Section 9 petition after holding that campaign-related emails did not constitute a genuine pre-existing dispute....
Corporate Law : IBBI cancelled an IP’s registration over systemic CIRP misuse, flawed valuations, non-disclosures, compliance failures and lack ...
Corporate Law : IBBI has released the Phase 10 syllabus for the Limited Insolvency Examination, effective from October 1, 2026, to reflect evolvin...
Corporate Law : The First Appellate Authority directed the CPIO to dispose of the RTI application after finding it was not decided within the 30-d...
Corporate Law : The Disciplinary Committee found that the Resolution Professional delayed admission of a financial creditor's claim and failed to ...
Corporate Law : The Disciplinary Committee imposed a two-year suspension after finding failures in claim verification, unauthorized financial deci...
Understand bankruptcy orders – legal declarations indicating financial inability to repay debts. Learn implications, initiation, trustee roles, and legal basis for relief.
Cross-border insolvency can be construed as those insolvency matters where a debtor who has declared himself to be as insolvent has assets in more than one jurisdiction or country, and its creditors, too, reside overseas. And, therefore, it could also be termed as an international insolvency.
Explore the complexities of cross-border insolvency, its significance, legal frameworks, and landmark cases like Jet Airways. Understand the UNCITRAL Model Law’s role and India’s regulatory developments.
Explore the intricacies of personal guarantor liability in corporate insolvency under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016. Detailed analysis, landmark cases, and judicial interpretations unveiled.
NCLAT Delhi ruling on Adisri Commercial Pvt. Ltd. Vs RBI & Ors. : Recall applications filed by Appellant are nothing but application to review judgment on merits which power is not vested with Adjudicating Authority.
Insolvency And Bankruptcy Board of India Vs Satyanarayan Bankatlal Malu & Ors (Supreme Court of India) The recent Supreme Court ruling in the case of Insolvency And Bankruptcy Board of India Vs Satyanarayan Bankatlal Malu & Ors clarifies the jurisdiction of Special Courts under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code. Analyzing the provisions of Section 236(1) […]
Learn about appointment, roles, and limitations of a resolution professional in insolvency and bankruptcy process. Explore key insights and relevant cases.
The judgment by the Delhi High Court in the case of Ireo Fiveriver Pvt. Ltd. vs Income Tax Department & Anr. underscores the importance of upholding the sanctity of approved Resolution Plans under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code. It reaffirms that once a resolution plan is approved, the successful resolution applicant cannot be subjected to additional liabilities arising from periods preceding the approval.
Delhi HC explains why NFAC cannot invoke Section 144B of the Income Tax Act if a claim is not lodged within the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) timeframe. Detailed analysis based on M Tech Developers Pvt. Ltd. Vs National Faceless Assessment Centre.
1. The NCLAT Delhi In Anil Agrawal v. Omega as per the attached Order Delivered on: 11.04.2023 The company was formed as a joint venture (JV) between Omega Engineering Holding BV (Omega Group) and an Indian partnership firm called Friends Refrigeration and Associates (FRA). Clause 8 of the JVA, it was the Petitioner who was to […]
