Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Sachin Bhaskar Kurandale Vs ITO (ITAT Pune)
Related Assessment Year : 2017-18
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sachin Bhaskar Kurandale Vs ITO (ITAT Pune) Procedural Lapse Not Fatal- Substance Over Form: Section 89(1) Relief Can’t Be Denied for Return-Filing Technicality Pune ITAT (SMC Bench) set aside order of CIT(A) & remanded matter to AO for fresh adjudication of Assessee’s claim of relief u/s 89(1), holding that mere non-claim in last revised return cannot defeat a substantive claim made during assessment proceedings. In Sachin Bhaskar Kurandale Vs. ITO , Assessee, a salaried individual, had filed multiple revised returns & furnished Form 10E online during assessment. AO accepted incom...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Section 68 Additions Fail: Documentary Evidence Cannot Be Ignored Without Enquiry Commission Disallowance Remanded – 133(6) Non-Response Not Sufficient; Ad-hoc Expenses Cut to 10% Stamp Duty vs Actual Value Dispute: ITAT Orders DVO Valuation ITAT Bangalore Remands ₹49L Sec 68 Addition & ₹3.74L TDS Disallowance for Fresh Verification Penalty U/s 272A(1)(d) Deleted: Reasonable Cause Subsequent Compliance Accepted View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
April 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930