Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Carcanet Infra Projects Private Limited Vs ITO (ITAT Pune)
Related Assessment Year : 2018-19
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download. Already Upgraded? Login here to access.
Carcanet Infra Projects Private Limited Vs ITO (ITAT Pune) Section 68 Applies Even to Customer Advances: Pune ITAT Remands Real Estate Developer’s ₹15.95 Crore Addition The Pune ITAT held that customer advances received by a real estate developer are not automatically immune from scrutiny under Section 68 and that the assessee must establish the identity, genuineness and creditworthiness of the parties from whom such advances are received. The assessee, engaged in construction and development of plots, had received fresh advances of ₹15.95 crore during AY 2018-19. The Assessing Officer t...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Defect in Section 143(2) Notice Format Is Curable Under Section 292B: ITAT Bangalore Cash Loan Enforceable Under NI Act Despite Section 269SS Breach: SC Kolkata ITAT Quashes Assessment as Section 143(2) Notice Was Without Jurisdiction BSNL VRS-2019 Ex-gratia Fully Exempt Under Section 10(10B): Surat ITAT Patna ITAT Deletes Search Additions Based on Retracted Statements & Estimates View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
July 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031