Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Hemant Enterprises Vs ACIT (ITAT Pune)
Related Assessment Year : 2019-2020
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download. Already Upgraded? Login here to access.
Hemant Enterprises Vs ACIT (ITAT Pune) Deductor’s Default Can’t Punish Deductee: 26AS Not Gospel: TDS Credit Allowed Though Deductor Failed to Deposit Tax Pune ITAT held that Assessee cannot be denied TDS credit merely because deductor failed to deposit TDS with Government, once deduction of tax at source is established. In Hemant Enterprises Vs. ACIT, Circle-1, Nashik, CPC denied TDS credit of ₹27.14 lakh while processing return u/s 143(1) for AY 2019-20 as the amount was not reflected in Form 26AS, since deductor Mumbai WTR Pvt. Ltd. had deducted TDS but not remitted it. CIT(A)/NFAC up...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Kolkata ITAT Quashes Assessment as Section 143(2) Notice Was Without Jurisdiction BSNL VRS-2019 Ex-gratia Fully Exempt Under Section 10(10B): Surat ITAT Patna ITAT Deletes Search Additions Based on Retracted Statements & Estimates Interest on Delayed Sales Tax, Service Tax & PF Payments Deductible; TDS Interest Disallowed: Patna ITAT Section 54F Deduction Allowed on Genuine House Purchase from In-Laws: Mumbai ITAT View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
July 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031