Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Carona Limited Vs DCIT (Bombay High Court)
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Carona Limited Vs DCIT (Bombay High Court)

AO passed 143(3) order by adding back inter-alia the amount of ad-hoc bonus of Rs.22,21,123/- which was not offered by the Assessee for taxation,  recording  a finding that the case was fit for attracting the provisions of Sec 271(1)(c  for imposition of penalty on account of explanation of the Assessee in respect of the bonus amount not being found bonafide. The penalty was later levi

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

ITAT Bangalore dismisses appeal by assessee due to lack of grievance against 263 Order & delay No Penalty for Disallowed Advances & Interest Claims: ITAT Bangalore Assessee proves identity & creditworthiness of lender: Upholds deletion of Addition Double addition on same property transaction: Bangalore ITAT remands matter to AO ITAT Quashes Reassessment for Non-Compliance with GKN Drive Shaft Judgment View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Ads Free tax News and Updates
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2025
M T W T F S S
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28293031