Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Carona Limited Vs DCIT (Bombay High Court)
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Carona Limited Vs DCIT (Bombay High Court) AO passed 143(3) order by adding back inter-alia the amount of ad-hoc bonus of Rs.22,21,123/- which was not offered by the Assessee for taxation,  recording  a finding that the case was fit for attracting the provisions of Sec 271(1)(c  for imposition of penalty on account of explanation of the Assessee in respect of the bonus amount not being found bonafide. The penalty was later levied.   On appeal, CIT(A), set aside the penalty by allowing,  inter-alia, holing   that the explanation offered by the Assessee for not offering ad-hoc bonus am...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

WhatsApp Chats & Third-Party Tally Data Alone Can’t Create Tax Liability: ITAT Mumbai Excel Sheets & Third-Party Statements Alone Cannot Prove Cash Payment: ITAT Mumbai Demonetisation Sales Cannot Be Treated as Bogus for Accepting SBNs: ITAT Bangalore Form 16 Trap: ITAT Deletes ₹51 Lakh Penalty on Wrong ESOP Exemption Claim Pune ITAT Quashes Section 148 Notice for Taking Sanction From PCIT Instead of PCCIT View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
May 2026
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031