Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Bandigadi Chandrappashetty Rajashekara Vs ITO (ITAT Bangalore)
Related Assessment Year : 2015-16
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Bandigadi Chandrappashetty Rajashekara Vs ITO (ITAT Bangalore) ITAT Bangalore held that initiation of revisionary proceedings under section 263 of the Income Tax Act by CIT based on the recommendation of the AO is not maintainable. Accordingly, revisionary order set aside and appeal allowed. Facts- The present appeal has been preferred by the assessee, however, it is filed with a delay of 1249 days. The assessee in the Affidavit submitted that delay is due to two reasons i.e. COVID19 and further the email id of Tax Practitioner was furnished in the Income-tax Return. Therefore, all the notices...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930