Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Bajaj Auto Ltd. Vs PCIT (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2019-20
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Bajaj Auto Ltd. Vs PCIT (ITAT Mumbai) Section 263 Invoked on “Inadequate Enquiry” Set Aside: ITAT Mumbai Quashes PCIT’s Revision in Bajaj Auto Ltd. Case Summary: The Mumbai Bench of the ITAT allowed the appeal of Bajaj Auto Ltd. and quashed the revisionary order passed under section 263 by the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax for AY 2019-20, holding that the assumption of jurisdiction was unsustainable in law. The PCIT had invoked section 263 on the ground that the assessment order passed under section 143(3) read with section 144C(3) was erroneous and prejudicial to the interests of...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

WhatsApp Chats & Third-Party Tally Data Alone Can’t Create Tax Liability: ITAT Mumbai Excel Sheets & Third-Party Statements Alone Cannot Prove Cash Payment: ITAT Mumbai Demonetisation Sales Cannot Be Treated as Bogus for Accepting SBNs: ITAT Bangalore Form 16 Trap: ITAT Deletes ₹51 Lakh Penalty on Wrong ESOP Exemption Claim Pune ITAT Quashes Section 148 Notice for Taking Sanction From PCIT Instead of PCCIT View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
May 2026
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031