Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : DCIT Vs Radhika Diamonds (ITAT Ahmedabad)
Related Assessment Year : 2017-18
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

DCIT Vs Radhika Diamonds (ITAT Ahmedabad)

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) Ahmedabad dismissed the Revenue’s appeal against the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) [CIT(A)], who had deleted an addition of ₹1,00,00,000 made by the Assessing Officer (AO) under Section 68 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, for the assessment year 2017-18 in the case of DCIT vs. Radhika Diamonds. The AO had made the addition, treating a cash deposit of ₹1,00,00,000 during the demonetization period as unexplained income from undisclosed sources, invoking Section 115BBE. The AO&

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Author Bio

A Blogger by Passion and a Chartered Accountant by Profession. View Full Profile

My Published Posts

No adverse GST Order Without Personal Hearing: Allahabad HC Canara Bank Wins ITAT Appeal: Section 115JB Not Applicable Bombay HC Declares Assessment Order Invalid for Exceeding Section 144C(13) Deadline Section 115JB not applicable to banking companies: ITAT Bangalore Bombay HC Criticizes ITAT for Delayed Order, Restores Rectification Plea View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Ads Free tax News and Updates
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
April 2025
M T W T F S S
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
282930