Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Satyapal Singh Chauhan HUF Vs ITO (ITAT Chandigarh)
Related Assessment Year : 2020-21
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Satyapal Singh Chauhan HUF Vs ITO (ITAT Chandigarh) When AO Makes Inquiry, PCIT Cannot Step In – ITAT Chandigarh Quashes PCIT’s Revision u/s 263 – AO Had Already Verified Agricultural Income Background Assessee HUF owns 36 acres of agricultural land with tubewell connection, regularly declaring substantial agricultural income: AY 2018-19 – ₹26.94 lakh (accepted u/s 143(1)) AY 2019-20 – ₹29.79 lakh (accepted u/s 143(1)) AY 2020-21 – ₹34.47 lakh (accepted u/s 143(3)) For AY 2020-21, case was selected under CASS for limited scrutiny on agricultural income. AO issued de...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Reopening Fails on Both Counts: Invalid Sec 148A Notice and Time-Barred Sec 148 Render Assessment Void Coffee Income: Rule 7B Overrides Rule 7 – ITAT Remands for Segregation of Own vs Purchased Produce Duty Drawback Taxable Only on Receipt – ITAT Deletes Addition & U/s 270A Penalty Skill Development = “Education” – ITAT Allows Sec 11 Exemption to Charitable Trust No Penalty for Wrong Claim or Head of Income – ITAT Deletes Section 271(1)(c) Penalty View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
April 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930