Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Satyapal Singh Chauhan HUF Vs ITO (ITAT Chandigarh)
Related Assessment Year : 2020-21
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Satyapal Singh Chauhan HUF Vs ITO (ITAT Chandigarh) When AO Makes Inquiry, PCIT Cannot Step In – ITAT Chandigarh Quashes PCIT’s Revision u/s 263 – AO Had Already Verified Agricultural Income Background Assessee HUF owns 36 acres of agricultural land with tubewell connection, regularly declaring substantial agricultural income: AY 2018-19 – ₹26.94 lakh (accepted u/s 143(1)) AY 2019-20 – ₹29.79 lakh (accepted u/s 143(1)) AY 2020-21 – ₹34.47 lakh (accepted u/s 143(3)) For AY 2020-21, case was selected under CASS for limited scrutiny on agricultural income. AO issued de...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930