Advertisement
Advertisement
Skip to content
Follow Us on
Advertisement
TOP STORIES
Income Tax

ITAT Surat: 263 Orders Passed Just to ‘Keep Issue Alive’ Set Aside for Fresh Adjudication

Case Law Details

TaxGuru Citation
2025 taxguru.in 7964
Case Name
Sachin Notified Area Vs PCIT (TAT Surat)
Date of Judgement/Order
Only available for paid members
Related Assessment Year
2013-14
Advertisement


Sachin Notified Area Vs PCIT (TAT Surat)

Background

  • SNA, constituted under Gujarat Industrial Development Act (GIDA), filed NIL returns claiming exemption u/s 10(20).
  • Reassessments completed u/s 147 r.w.s. 144B on 30.03.2022, denying exemption following SC ruling in NOIDA vs. CCIT (95 taxmann.com 58).
  • AO accepted treatment of FDR interest ₹9.16 Cr directly credited to reserves in balance sheet, without routing through I&E a/c
  • PCIT held AO erred in not taxing interest under “income from other sources” & issued 263 orders.
  • Assessee argued identical 263 order for AY 2017-18 had been quashed by ITAT Surat (ITA 343/SRT/2022, order dt. 26.06.2023). PCIT ignored this, stating matter is sub judice before Gujarat HC & passed 263 “to keep issue alive”

Assessee’s Arguments

  • PCIT violated principles of natural justice – issued vague SCN without pointing out precise error.
  • AO had already examined exemption claim during reassessment; 263 amounts to mere change of opinion.
  • Relied on earlier ITAT ruling in its own case for AY 2017-18 quashing similar 263 order

Revenue’s Stand

  • FDR interest is revenue receipt, must be taxed as “income from other sources.”
  • SNA not a “local authority” under Article 243P; exemption u/s 10(20) not available per SC in NOIDA.
  • AO failed to make requisite addition despite clear SC law, making order erroneous & prejudicial

Tribunal’s Observations/ Decision

  • PCIT had not decided issue on merits, but only set aside order “to keep matter alive.”
  • Such approach improper – 263 must be exercised with clear findings, not deferred to AO.
  • Considering ITAT’s earlier decision for AY 2017-18 & submissions of both parties, Tribunal held matter needs fresh adjudication on merits by PCIT.
  • Orders of PCIT set aside; issues remanded
  • Appeals allowed for statistical purposes.
  • PCIT directed to re-examine matter afresh, considering assessee’s submissions & SC decision in NOIDA

FULL TEXT OF THE ORDER OF ITAT SURAT

Paid content

Become a Basic or Premium Member, or log in if you are already a Basic or Premium member.

Advertisement

Author Info

CA Vijayakumar Shetty
Qualification: CA in Practice
Company: Shetty & Co, Chartered Accountants, Mangalore
Location: Mangalore, Karnataka
Articles Published: 6,104

Join TaxGuru's Network for the latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.