Case Law Details
Case Name : Mohammed Irfan Abdul Vs Commissioner of Customs (CESTAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year :
Courts :
All CESTAT CESTAT Mumbai
Become a Premium member to Download.
If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Mohammed Irfan Abdul Vs Commissioner of Customs (CESTAT Mumbai)
Conclusion: Since none of the orders of the authorities below was at any discussion or finding regarding mensrea or unlawful gain to the appellant or attributing any knowledge on his part, therefore, the orders denying the duty exemption benefit and confirmed the differential duty of Rs.26,12,902/- with interest and imposed a penalty of Rs.26,12,902/- along with interest under Section 114A was merely proceed on basis of speculations which was not justified.
Held: Directorate of Revenue Intelligence, (DRI) gathered information that...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Kindly Refer to
Privacy Policy &
Complete Terms of Use and Disclaimer.

