This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Automatic Soap Dispenser Cannot Be Classified as Toiletry Spray Since Product Only Dispenses Foam: CESTAT Bangalore
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Xiaomi Technology India Private Limited Vs Commissioner of Customs (CESTAT Bangalore)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Courts
- All CESTAT, CESTAT Bangalore
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Advertisement
Xiaomi Technology India Private Limited Vs Commissioner of Customs (CESTAT Bangalore)
CESTAT Rules Automatic Soap Dispenser Falls Under CTI 8424 Because It Dispenses Rather Than Sprays; CESTAT Allows Appeal on Customs Classification Due to Difference Between Dispensing and Spraying Functions; Soap Dispenser Classified Under Mechanical Appliances Heading Because Product Disperses Liquid Soap; CESTAT Relies on HSN Notes to Hold Automatic Soap Dispenser Outside Scope of CTI 9616.
The appeal before the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Bangalore concerne...
Author Info
