Sri D. Srinivasa Rao Vs. Vaishnovi Infratech Ltd (NCLAT) Brief Facts: An application under Section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 against Respondent- ‘Vaishnovi Infratech Ltd.’ (Corporate Debtor) filed by the Appellant- Operational Creditor was rejected by the Adjudicating Authority (National Company Law Tribunal), Hyderabad Bench, Special Bench on the ground that the […]
Aster Technologies Pvt. Ltd. Vs Solas Fire Safety Equipment Pvt. Ltd (NCLAT) Brief Facts: An application was filed under Section 9 of IBC and the Adjudicating Authority issued Notice but none appeared for Respondent. The Adjudicating Authority disposed of by directing the Respondent to settle the issue in question within a stipulated period while observing […]
Pratap Technocrats P Ltd & Ors Vs. Monitoring Committee of Reliance Infratel Ltd & Anr (NCLAT) Brief Facts: The version of appellants says that they were kept unaware of the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process qua the Corporate Debtor, thus being wholly unaware of the progress of Resolution Process with no details provided by the Resolution […]
Jay Overseas Pvt. Ltd. Vs George Samuel (NCLAT Delhi) The Learned Counsel are not disputing that Respondent No. 2 is ‘Committee of Creditors’ having 100% voting right. The Learned Counsel for Respondent No. 2 submits that if this Hon’ble Tribunal directs the Respondent No. 2 is ready to consider the revised Resolution Plan (Annexure P/6). […]
Section 18 of the Limitation Act, 1963 would have no application to proceedings under I&B Code. Therefore, the issue raised as regards acknowledgement of liability by reflection in the Balance Sheet/ Annual Return would be irrelevant.
Mr Rajnish Jain Vs Manoj Kumar Singh – I.R.P. (NCLAT, Delhi) Resolution Professional or Committee of Creditors cannot reclassify status of a creditor from Financial to Operational Creditor NCLAT held that during CIRP, the IRP is authorised to collate the claims, and based on that he is empowered to constitute the Committee of Creditors. We […]
Volkswagen Finance Private Ltd. Vs Shree Balaji Printopack Pvt. Ltd. (NCLAT Delhi) From the documentary evidence on record it is clear that no ‘Charge’ has been registered under the provisions of Section 77(1) of the Companies Act 2013, in relation to the Subject Property. The Liquidator has rightly referred to Regulation 21 of IBBI (Liquidation […]
Lease rentals arising out of use and occupation of a cold storage unit which was for Commercial Purpose was an ‘Operational Debt’ as envisaged under Section 5 (21) of the Code.
NCLT must give a reasonable opportunity of making representations and of being heard before passing an order, to the Registrar, the Company and all the persons concerned under Section 252 (1) of the Companies Act, 2013.
The issue under consideration is whether the initiative of insolvency proceedings against Tata Chemicals is sustain even if the corporate debtor has not complied with the procedural aspects?
