This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Application u/s 9 of IBC, 2016 is maintainable irrespective of amount of claim
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Aster Technologies Pvt. Ltd. Vs Solas Fire Safety Equipment Pvt. Ltd (NCLAT)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Courts
- NCLAT
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Aster Technologies Pvt. Ltd. Vs Solas Fire Safety Equipment Pvt. Ltd (NCLAT)
Brief Facts: An application was filed under Section 9 of IBC and the Adjudicating Authority issued Notice but none appeared for Respondent. The Adjudicating Authority disposed of by directing the Respondent to settle the issue in question within a stipulated period while observing that:
“the Respondent did not appear before the Adjudicating Authority, the amount involved in the case is mere Rs. 4.35 lakhs and initiation of CIRP is not a solution for the Petitioner, which is a small entrepreneur and operational Cre...






